Friday, 7 December 2018

Christian Confusion: Christ is "Eternally Begotten"

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
وصلى الله على نبينا محمد
وعلى اهل بيته الطيبين الطاهرين المظلومين
According to trinitarian Christianity, Christ is “begotten” of God “the Father”, while not having a beginning, being co-eternal with God “the Father”. Our objection is how can someone be “begotten” while simultaneously eternal without beginning? It is a contradiction in terms. The Christian New Testament says about Christ that God addressed him with the words of the Psalm:
בְּנִי אַתָּה--אֲנִי, הַיּוֹם יְלִדְתִּיךָ
“Thou art My son, this day have I begotten thee.”
[Psalm 2:7]

This is affirmed in Acts 13:33 and Hebrews 1:5; 5:5. These are the claimed proof texts for the trinitarian doctrine that Jesus is literally “begotten” by God “the Father”, which they interpret to mean as being of the same substance as God “the Father”. The Greek word used in the New Testament is gegennēka “have begotten” from the verb gennaó which means “to beget, to bring forth, procreate a descendant, produce offspring” and in the passive “to be born”. Now it is impossible for someone to be eternal who is born or begotten, who was given birth to. An early Christian doctrine, Arianism, associated with Arius [d. 336 CE], recognized this difficulty and posited that although Christ was the divine “Son of God”, sharing divinity with “God the Father”, being of the same substance as him, since Christ was begotten by the “Father” he was not eternal but had a beginning. In this way the Arians resolved the contradiction by putting forward the idea that the second person of the triune “godhead”, though technically God and of the same substance as God the “Father”, was nevertheless not eternal but had a beginning. This doctrine was condemned as heresy in the Council of Nicea in 325 CE. The so-called “orthodox” trinitarian Church believes that Christ is “eternally begotten” but as I have said, that is illogical, a contradiction in terms, and meaningless from the perspective of language. One cannot be eternal and begotten simultaneously, as these are opposites. The Psalm itself states that the son is begotten “today”, refuting the idea of eternal or timeless begetting. Interestingly, this absurd doctrine of the “Father” eternally begetting the “Son” resembles the Ashari doctrine of Allah eternally speaking the Qur’an, known as Kalam Nafsi. The orthodox Islamic belief is that events do occur in the Essence of God, meaning He speaks and commits actions when and as He wills. Influenced by the Platonic idea that stasis is perfection, the Asharis denied the occurrence of events within God’s Essence, believing that to be an imperfection based on their Platonic worldview and false philosophical framework for establishing the existence of God. Hence they stated that the Qur’an is eternal and does not have a beginning, i.e. Allah has been speaking the Qur’an eternally. Furthermore, according to the Asharis, this eternal Qur’an is not the Qur’an we read with its letters and sounds, but is an ibara or expression of what we have of the Qur’an between our hands which transcends letters and sounds. For all intents and purposes, the Asharis actually believe in two Qur’ans, an eternal speech with Allah that is an expression of meaning, and the concrete Qur’an which we have that consists of letters and sounds, which the Asharis not only acknowledge as being distinct from the eternal Qur’an but also a created thing in line with the Mu’tazilite doctrine.

Government Upon Shoulder of the Messiah

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
وصلى الله على نبينا محمد
وعلى اهل بيته الطيبين الطاهرين المظلومين
One of the obvious similarities between the Prophets Moses and Muhammad عليهما الصلاة والسلام is  that they both were responsible for the administrative and political affairs of their communities. In the holy Torah, the Lord God says to Moses:
נָבִיא אָקִים לָהֶם מִקֶּרֶב אֲחֵיהֶם, כָּמוֹךָ; וְנָתַתִּי דְבָרַי, בְּפִיו, וְדִבֶּר אֲלֵיהֶם, אֵת כָּל-אֲשֶׁר אֲצַוֶּנּוּ
“I will raise them up a prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee; and I will put My words in his mouth, and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.”
[Deuteronomy 18:18]
This is in contrast to the promised Messiah of Nazareth عليه السلام who, during his lifetime, was a subject of the Romans and their client, Herod Antipas. Now regarding the Messiah, Isaiah apparently prophesied:
כִּי-יֶלֶד יֻלַּד-לָנוּ, בֵּן נִתַּן-לָנוּ, וַתְּהִי הַמִּשְׂרָה, עַל-שִׁכְמוֹ
“For a child is born unto us, a son is given unto us; and the government is upon his shoulder”
[Isaiah 9:5/6]

Now of course, Christians and Muslims believe that this messianic prophecy regarding the Messiah being a ruler with real, earthly power and dominion, shall be fulfilled during the second coming of Christ:
“Ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.”
[Mark 14:62; Matthew 26:64]

“And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.”
[Revelation 19:15]
لاَ تَقُومُ السَّاعَةُ حَتَّى يَنْزِلَ فِيكُمُ ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ حَكَمًا مُقْسِطًا
“The Hour will not be established until descends among you the Son of Mary, a just ruler.”
[Sahih al-Bukhari]

According to the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus the Messiah warned the people about the coming of false messiahs: “Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. Behold, I have told you before. Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be... And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.” [Matthew 24:23-27, 30]
“The Son of man” is the title with which Jesus refers to himself, I think because of the prophecy in Daniel: “one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him” [Daniel 7:13-14]
It should be pointed out here that the Aramaic word pelach does not mean “worship” as some Christian Bibles have mistakenly translated it, but rather “to pay reverence to”, corresponding to the Hebrew verb palach which means “to cleave” [Strong’s Concordance].
The holy Qur’an likewise mentions the attribute of the Messiah as being close or near to God, which may be a reference to his spiritual ascension:

اسْمُهُ الْمَسِيحُ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ وَجِيهًا فِي الدُّنْيَا وَالْآخِرَةِ وَمِنَ الْمُقَرَّبِينَ
“His name is the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, held in honor in [this] world and in the hereafter, and among the near.”
[Sura 3:45]

The Muqarrabin are in fact a category of Angels that are near God [Sura 4:172], who may also be termed the Kurubiyin [Cherubim]. As a consequence of his spiritual ascension, Jesus the Messiah was placed in the category of the Muqarribin, meaning he too was brought near the presence of the Most High, the Ancient of days, though in spirit and not with the corporal, earthly body. In the passage from Matthew chapter 24 which I have quoted above, it is apparent that Jesus the Messiah warned against “false christs”, and that people should be on their guard against such deceivers. The distinction between these false christs and the true Messiah “the Son of man” is that the latter’s advent shall be undeniable and clear, drawing on the parable of lightning that comes from the direction of the east though clearly visible in the west. And perhaps this is a prophecy that the Messiah shall come from an eastern direction, which corresponds to the Hadith of him descending to the east of Damascus. Coming in or with the clouds of heaven is from the Book of Daniel and Jesus repeats this as a sign of the Messiah in the Gospels. However, whether this is a literal descent from the sky or a simile expressing the heavenly authority that the Messiah shall exercise in establishing a heavenly kingdom here on the Earth that is powerful and glorious, is a debatable point. The authentic Hadith speak of the nuzul or “coming down” of the Messiah, and this is usually interpreted to mean coming down physically from Heaven. An isolated narration even states:
كَيْفَ أَنْتُمْ إِذَا نَزَلَ ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ مِنَ السَّمَاءِ فِيكُمْ وَإِمَامُكُمْ مِنْكُمْ
“How will you be when comes down the Son of Mary from Heaven among you, and your leader is among you?”
[al-Asma was-Siffat lil-Bayhaqi]

It appears to me that the addition “from Heaven” cannot solidly and genuinely be attributed to the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم because the same Hadith, as reported in the Sahihayn, omit them, and the principle of Hadith sciences is that when a narration, despite being technically authentic in its chain, differs with another narration from the Sahihayn, the narration of the Sahihayn is given preference, and Allah knows best.
According to an authentic Hadith, the Prophet Muhammad met with Jesus the Messiah عليهما السلام during the night of his Isra – the spiritual night journey to the Holy Land – and it was at that time that the Messiah informed him:

فَأَنْزِلُ
“I shall descend”
[Sunan Ibn Maja #4081]

Therefore, the second advent of the Messiah is the coming of he himself, though we do not know the reality of how it shall be, i.e., whether it is physically coming down from Heaven, or the spirit of the Messiah coming down in another body – Allah knows best. I have previously stated that prophecies regarding the second coming of a historic prophet may be interpreted to mean the coming of that prophet’s likeness, where the likeness is nevertheless a distinct person. I cited the examples of the second coming of King David and the second coming of Elijah, fulfilled in the persons of Jesus and John the Baptist respectively عليهم السلام. However, in light of the Hadith and the messianic prophecies of the Bible, the stronger view is that Jesus son of Mary himself is coming. For if Jesus the Messiah will not return as a ruler with power and dominion, then in what sense has the holy Qur’an refered to him as al-Masiha? It is clear from the Bible and the words of Jesus himself that the concept of the Messiah is that the latter shall wield dominion on the Earth, acting as a ruler and king. I truly believe that the Davidic Messiah whom the Jews are still expecting is none other than Jesus of Nazareth, but if Jesus of Nazareth shall not return to exercise dominion over the Holy Land, then it is meaningless to consider him the Messiah, but Allah knows best. Some Christians and apparently some Muslims too have spiritualized the concept of the Messiah and do not think it is necessary that the Messiah actually exercise any kind of political authority in the Earth. This Christian idea that prophets of God are never meant to exercise dominion in the Earth can be seen in their objection to the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم. In the Teaching of Jacob, a 7th century Greek Christian text, one of the earliest Christian historical references to our Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم, it is stated: “And they were saying that the prophet had appeared, coming with the Saracens, and that he was proclaiming the advent of the anointed one, the Christ who was to come. I, having arrived at Sykamina, stopped by a certain old man well-versed in scriptures, and I said to him: ‘What can you tell me about the prophet who has appeared with the Saracens?’ He replied, groaning deeply: ‘He is false, for the prophets do not come armed with a sword.’”
This idea that prophets do not come armed with a sword is of course un-Biblical. Both the prophets Moses and his successor Joshua led battles in the name of God against the pagan tribes, such as Amalek. It is in this sense that the Prophet Muhammad has been compared to Prophet Moses عليهما السلام [Deut. 18:18] as both prophets led their people into battle against the pagans, with divine instruction and aid. It is also interesting that the text of the Teaching of Jacob acknowledges that the prophesy of Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم revolves around proclaiming the advent of the Messiah. This is an early historical witness that Islam is an apocalyptic religion, and that the doctrine of the coming of the Messiah, though not explicit from the holy Qur’an [though certainly implicit], nevertheless was held to and preached by Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم and the early Muslims. Moses was immediately succeeded by his right-hand man, Joshua, who was granted the gift of prophesy. Under his leadership, the Israelites conquered the Holy Land, defeating the pagan tribes, famously in the Battle of Jericho. Subsequently, the nation of Israel was ruled by a series of judges, military strongmen, until the advent of the Prophet Samuel عليه السلام, in whose time the Lord God blessed Israel with a monarchy. So we see how the history of ancient Israel, after their deliverance from bondage in Egypt and the last days of Moses, parallels that of the early history of Islam. In both instances, the community of the faithful were granted dominion in the land and real political authority. The succession to Moses by another prophet, Joshua, then a series of judges, is like the succession to Prophet Muhammad by the Siddiq, Abu Bakr, and the rest of the rightly-guided Caliphs رضى الله عنهم who may be likened to the Israelite judges [Othniel, Ehud, Gideon, Samson, etc.] These were not merely righteous men who were spiritually close to the Lord God, they were granted dominion in the land and political authority over their communities as a divine favor. Because the would be followers of Christ deviated from his message so early on, largely due to the influence of Paul of Tarsus – they were deprived of this divine favor for centuries. Only when Constantine converted to Christianity in the early 4th century CE did the Christian Church get its first taste of power and dominion, but by that time the religion had undergone so many fundamental deviations from the original teachings and beliefs of Jesus that it would have been absolutely unrecognizable to him.

Monday, 3 December 2018

First Qur'an Then Sunna

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
وصلى الله على خاتم النبيين
والعاقبة للمتقين
The first source of judgment for legal matters is the Book of Allah in the methodology of the Sahaba and the Salaf رضى الله عنهم. The second source is the Prophet’s صلوات الله وسلامه عليه Sunna. This is explained in the Hadith of Mu’adh b. Jabal رضى الله عنه:
أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَعَثَ مُعَاذًا إِلَى الْيَمَنِ فَقَالَ ‏‏ كَيْفَ تَقْضِي ‏‏ ‏.‏ فَقَالَ أَقْضِي بِمَا فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ ‏.‏ قَالَ ‏‏ فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ ‏‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ فَبِسُنَّةِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏.‏ قَالَ ‏ فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ فِي سُنَّةِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَجْتَهِدُ رَأْيِي ‏.‏ قَالَ ‏‏ الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ الَّذِي وَفَّقَ رَسُولَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم
The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) sent Mu’adh to the Yemen and said: “How will you judge?” So Mu’adh said: “I will judge by what is in the Book of Allah”. The Prophet said: “If it is not in the Book of Allah?” Mu’adh said: “Then by the Sunna of the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him). The Prophet said: “If it is not in the Sunna of the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him)?” Mu’adh said: “I shall make ijtihad by my opinion.” The Prophet said: “All praise belongs to Allah Who made the emissary of the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) in agreement.” (Jami al-Tirmidhi #1327)
The muhaddith, Albani, weakened this Hadith due to the anonymity of the companions of Mu’adh bin Jabal who are narrating the incident. However, Albani objected to the content of the Hadith too, stating: “Weakness of the Hadeeth of Muadh in the Opinion and its Disapproval. Before I conclude my talk, I think I must direct the attention of brethren present to a well known hadeeth. It is devoid of one of the books of jurisprudence on account of its weakness in respect of its chain of narrators (isnad) and its contradiction with what we have concluded in this talk, regarding the illegitimacy of discrimination in law between the Quran and Sunnah; and the necessity of taking both. It is hadeeth of Muadh bin Jabal, may Allah be pleased with him, that the prophet, salla Allahu alihi wasallam, said to him when he sent him to Yemen: ‘By what source will you decide ?’ He said: ‘By the Book of Allah’ He then asked: ‘If you don’t find any guidance ?’ He said: ‘By the Sunnah of his Messenger’ He then asked again: ‘And if you don’t find any guidance?’ He said: ‘I will make an effort to form my own opinion.’ He said: ‘Praise be to Allah who made successful the effort of the envoy of the Messenger of Allah, to what the prophet likes.’ As of the weakness of it’s isnad, there is no scope for its explanation now. But I have explained it clearly in the above mentioned book chain. It would suffice now to mention that the Commander of the Believers in the hadeeth Imam Al-Bukhari, may Allah have mercy on him, says that the hadeeth is not recognized (munkar). After this I am permitted to begin to explain the conflict which I pointed. The tradition of Muadh gives the ruler a method of three stages which does not permit to search for any rule with regard to 'Rae' (personal opinion) except that he does not find it in the Sunnah, nor in the Sunnah except that after he does not find it in the Qur'an. It is in relation to Rae a genuine method with all the learned (Ulama), so that they say: ‘Where there is a tradition relating the deeds and utterances of the Prophet, salla Allah u alihi wa sallam, personal opinion is void’. But in relation to Sunnah, it is not true, because Sunnah dictates the Qur’an and clarifies its doctrines. It is then essential to search for a ruling in Sunnah, even if he thinks it is found in the Qur’an as we have mentioned it. Sunnah is not with the Qur’an in the same manner as Rae with the Sunnah. No, definitely not. It is rather necessary to regard Qur’an and Sunnah as being one source with no discrimination between the two whatsoever. This is indicated in a saying of the prophet, salla Allahu alihi wasallam: ‘Certainly I have come with the Qur’an and its like (meaning the Sunnah)’. He said: ‘They are never departed until they come to the Basin’. The compilation mentioned between them is not correct because the separation between them is void as we have explained. (Manzilat as-Sunna fil-Islam pp.21-22):




However, Albani has ignored the statements of senior companions of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم:
عَنْ شُرَيْحٍ ، أَنَّ عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ كَتَبَ إلَيْهِ : إذَا جَاءَكَ شَيْءٌ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ فَاقْضِ بِهِ , وَلَا يَلْفِتَنَّكَ عَنْهُ الرِّجَالُ , فَإِنْ جَاءَكَ أَمْرٌ لَيْسَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ ، فَانْظُرْ سُنَّةَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَاقْضِ بِهَا , فَإِنْ جَاءَكَ مَا لَيْسَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ وَلَيْسَ فِيهِ سُنَّةٌ مِنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ ، فَانْظُرْ مَا اجْتَمَعَ النَّاسُ عَلَيْهِ فَخُذْ بِهِ , فَإِنْ جَاءَكَ مَا لَيْسَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ وَلَمْ يَكُنْ فِيهِ سُنَّةٌ مِنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَلَمْ يَتَكَلَّمْ فِيهِ أَحَدٌ قَبْلَكَ ، فَاخْتَرْ أَيَّ الْأَمْرَيْنِ شِئْتَ : إنْ شِئْتَ أَنْ تَجْتَهِدَ بِرَأْيِكَ وَتَقَدَّمَ فَتَقَدَّمْ , وَإِنْ شِئْتَ أَنْ تَتَأَخَّرَ فَتَأَخَّرْ , وَلَا أَرَى التَّأَخُّرَ إلَّا خَيْرًا لَكَ
Shurayh narrates that Umar b. al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote to him: “When there comes to you something in the Book of Allah then judge by it. And when there comes to you a matter that is not in the Book of Allah, then look to the Sunna of the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him). And if it is not in the Sunna of the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) then look to that which the people have concensus upon and take that. And if there comes to you that which is not in the Book of Allah, not in the Sunnah of the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) no one before you spoke about it, then you have two options which you may choose according to your will. If you wish you may make ijtihad through your opinion or if you wish you may delay it, and I do not see in delaying anything but good for you.” (Musannaf Ibn Abi Shayba)
عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ يَزِيدَ ، قَالَ : أَكْثَرُوا عَلَى عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ذَاتَ يَوْمٍ ، فَقَالَ : يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ , قَدْ أَتَى عَلَيْنَا زَمَانٌ لَسْنَا نَقْضِي , وَلَسْنَا هُنَاكَ , ثُمَّ إنَّ اللَّهَ قَدْ رَأَى مِنَ الْأَمْرِ مَا تَرَوْنَ , فَمَنْ عَرَضَ لَهُ مِنْكُمْ قَضَاءٌ بَعْدَ الْيَوْمِ فَلِيَقْضِ بِمَا فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ , فَإِنْ جَاءَهُ أَمْرٌ لَيْسَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ فَلْيَقْضِ بِمَا قَضَى بِهِ نَبِيُّهُ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَإِنْ جَاءَهُ أَمْرٌ لَيْسَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ وَلَمْ يَقْضِ بِهِ نَبِيُّهُ فَلْيَقْضِ بِمَا قَضَى بِهِ الصَّالِحُونَ , فَإِنْ أَتَاهُ أَمْرٌ لَيْسَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ وَلَمْ يَقْضِ بِهِ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَلَمْ يَقْضِ بِهِ الصَّالِحُونَ فَلْيَجْتَهِدْ بِرَأْيِهِ وَلَا يَقُولُ : إنِّي أَرَى وَإِنِّي أَخَافُ , فَإِنَّ الْحَلَالَ بَيِّنٌ وَالْحَرَامَ بَيِّنٌ , وَبَيْنَ ذَلِكَ أُمُورٌ مُشْتَبِهَاتٌ فَدَعْ مَا يَرِيبُكَ إلَى مَا لَا يَرِيبُكَ
Abd Allah b. Mas’ud said: “He should judge by what is in the Book of Allah, but if a matter comes to him that is not in the Book of Allah, then he should judge by what his Prophet (peace be upon him) judged, and when there comes to him a matter that is not in the Book of Allah nor did his Prophet (peace be upon him) judge it, then he should judge by what the Righteous judged. And when there comes to him a matter that is not in the Book of Allah, nor did the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) judge it, nor did the Righteous judge it, then he should make ijtihad of his opinion.” (ibid)
عَنْ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ أَبِي يَزِيدَ ، قَالَ : كَانَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ إذَا سُئِلَ عَنِ الْأَمْرِ , وَكَانَ فِي الْقُرْآنِ أَخْبَرَ بِهِ , وَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ فِي الْقُرْآنِ فَكَانَ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَخْبَرَ بِهِ , فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ فَعَنْ أَبِي بَكْرٍ وَعُمَرَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُما , فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ ، قَالَ فِيهِ بِرَأْيِهِ
Ibn Abbas used to, when asked about a matter, and it was in the Quran, inform of it, and if it was not in the Quran, he would, from the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him), inform of it. And if it was not (there), then from Abi Bakr and Umar (Allah be pleased with them both), and if it not (there), he would give his opinion. (ibid)
What these narrations explain is that the proper methodology for judging any matter is to first refer to the Book of Allah for an answer. If the Book of Allah is silent on the matter, then the judge should refer to the Prophet’s Sunna. If the Sunna is likewise silent on the matter, then the matter is easy, and different companions gave different instructions. According to some, the judge should refer to the concensus on the community, or implement a legal precedent from a preceding ruling of another judge, or refer to the judgment of sayyidina Abi Bakr and sayyidina Umar رضى الله عنهما or the righteous, or else make ijtihad and give his informed opinion.

Thursday, 29 November 2018

Prophesy Within al-Abbas RA

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
وصلى الله على خاتم النبيين
والعاقبة للمتقين
It is related in several books of Hadith that sayyidina Abi Huraira رضى الله عنه narrated that the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم said to his uncle al-Abbas رضى الله عنه:
فِيكُمُ النُّبُوَّةُ وَالْمَمْلَكَةُ
“Within you is prophesy and monarchy”
The muhaddithin reject this Hadith due to the narrator Muhammad b. Abdir-Rahman al-‘Amiri. However, the narrator is actually Muhammad b. Abdir-Rahman b. Thawban al-‘Amiri, who is not weak but thiqa:

If authentic, this Hadith is a predictive statement regarding there being dynastic rule from the progeny of sayyidina Abbas رضى الله عنه, i.e., the Abbasid dynasty. But the same Hadith states that there will also be Nubuwwa or prophesy within sayyidina Abbas رضى الله عنه and his family, the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم having addressed him in the second person plural. Perhaps this means that within sayyidina Abbas رضى الله عنه himself and maybe among some saintly individuals from his progeny, there is a trace of or manifestation of Nubuwwa. This is the partial Nubuwwa known as al-Mubashirat, as the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم said:
لَا نُبُوَّةَ بَعْدِي إِلَّا الْمُبَشِّرَاتِ
“There is no prophesy after me except the Mubashshirat”
(Musnad Ahmad)
And the Mubashshirat, as the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم explained, are the true and pious visions from Allah that one sees and experiences. Regarding the saintly person of sayyidina Abbas رضى الله عنه, it is known that he was very close and dear to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم. Since he outlived his beloved nephew صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم he was a natural candidate to succeed the latter. Although he did not formally succeed him in the institution of khilafa as Allah decreed and favored sayyidina Abi Bakr رضى الله عنه for that office through the consultation of Saqifa Bani Sa’ida. But he (Abbas) was a successor of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم in the spiritual sense, like many other of the Prophets’ eminent companions. Hence, sayyidina Anas رضى الله عنه narrates:
أَنَّ عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ، كَانَ إِذَا قَحَطُوا اسْتَسْقَى بِالْعَبَّاسِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الْمُطَّلِبِ، فَقَالَ اللَّهُمَّ إِنَّا كُنَّا نَتَوَسَّلُ إِلَيْكَ بِنَبِيِّنَا صلى الله عليه وسلم فَتَسْقِينَا، وَإِنَّا نَتَوَسَّلُ إِلَيْكَ بِعَمِّ نَبِيِّنَا فَاسْقِنَا‏.‏ قَالَ فَيُسْقَوْنَ
Whenever there was drought, Umar b. al-Khattab used to ask Allah for rain through al-Abbas bin Abdul Muttalib, saying, “Allahumma! We used to request our Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم to ask You for rain, and You would give us. Now we request the uncle of our Prophet to ask You for rain, so give us rain.” And they would be given rain. (Sahih al-Bukhari)
And this Hadith demonstrates that there was a trace of the kamalat of prophesy within sayyidina Abbas which he inherited from his nephew صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم and Allah knows best.

Reality of Bid'ah

  بِسۡمِ اللّٰہِ الرَّحۡمٰنِ الرَّحِیۡمِ اَلۡحَمۡدُ لِلّٰہِ رَبِّ الۡعٰلَمِیۡنَ ‌ السَّلَامُ ‌عَلَيْكَ ‌أَيُّهَا ‌النَّبِيُّ ‌وَرَحْمَةُ ‌...