Thursday, June 11, 2026

Revenge of the Far Right

 بِسۡمِ اللّٰہِ الرَّحۡمٰنِ الرَّحِیۡمِ

In the Name of Allah, the Rahman, the Merciful


Racial, ethnic and religious tensions are currently at a boiling point in the United Kingdom, while the temperature is rising fast in much of the rest of Europe and the Anglosphere.


The needle that has broken the camel’s back is the recent murder of Henry Nowak by a Nihang Sikh, Vickrum Digwa, in Southampton and the attempted murder and maiming of Stephen Ogilvie in Belfast by a Black Sudanese asylum seeker, Hadi Alodid.


It is critical that Muslims, especially those of us living in the West as a vulnerable minority, totally understand the dynamics behind the rise of the Far Right and the growing trend of White nationalism and nativism.


To date, I have not come across any Muslim influencer, leader or intellectual that has accurately diagnosed the situation and its implications for us. It is fair to say that Muslims in the West are more or less oblivious to the cause and reality of this tidal wave that is apparently heading in our direction. And it is fair to say that our community here is mostly passive and not active in any meaningful sense of the word.


Muslims in the West committed the blunder of focusing on the STEM fields (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) to the total detriment of the social sciences, and crucial fields like journalism, psychology, law and political science. The Jewish community, however, did not make this blunder, which explains why their lobby in Western countries are so much more influential and effective than ours, and why they have produced a superior intelligentsia to guide and empower their people.


This begins to explain why Muslims are unable to do effective politics in the West. Our poor excuse for a political leadership and representation is unable to articulate our interests let alone produce a strategy to protect and advance them.


Undoubtedly, the Left and the liberal political establishment in the West is doing its best to prevent the rise of an independent Muslim political leadership, especially in those Western European countries that have significantly large Muslim populations like the UK, France and Germany. Muslims should recognize that our interests fundamentally diverge from those of the liberal Left, yet the latter arrogantly speaks on behalf of us.


But despite the obvious fact that Muslims are the primary, arguably exclusive, target of the Far Right’s hatred and bigotry, the liberal Left is more interested in placing the LGBTQ “community” at the forefront of everything. Muslims don’t even realize that we vastly outnumber the LGBTQ and other minorities the liberal Left expends considerably more effort representing and celebrating, and that we are being taken for granted in the worst conceivable manner.


The tired mantra of the Left is that everything is about class, and the only identity politics that is valid is the working class identity. Keep in mind that the base of the Far Right are so-called working class White people. The Left does not want to disassociate from such people, it wants to convince them and us that we all have the same interests and are oppressed by the same enemy (the capitalists). The Left is gaslighting Muslims and some other minorities in this regard.


The 21st century thus far has been a time of rapid demographic transformation of the West. The United States of America is now barely 60% White non-Hispanic. In Canada it is 70%, in the UK it is 80% and in France and Germany it is approximately 75%.


The Far Right narrative is that this demographic transformation is the result of a conspiracy known as the Great Replacement. The more ideological elements of the Far Right hold Jewish elites as the main force behind the replacement and gradual elimination of White people through the phenomenon of mass migration of non-White peoples to the West.


I also lean toward the view that a powerful cabal that is ultimately responsible for policy is predominantly Jewish and there are at least some elements within that cabal which thirst for revenge against Western civilization for its history of inflicting pogroms and the Holocaust upon them. Apparently, this project of cold revenge involves mass migration of non-White people to bring about the collapse and final destruction of Western civilization.


Religious Jews understand Edom in the Bible as a reference to Western Christendom, and that Jewry is destined to clash with and defeat Edom or Rome when the Davidic Messiah arrives.


Secular Jews are not content to wait for a Messiah that may never come and largely see the current State of Israel as replacing any need for some future savior. While today the State of Israel is reckoning with its surrounding Arab and Muslim neighbors, having more or less pacified them, they are not heedless of the fact that tomorrow it would have been Europe and Christendom that proved to be the more dangerous enemy had it not been mired in its current demographic crisis.


The Zionist alliance with the Far Right, or at least a major element thereof, is a somewhat fragile one. It is not a partnership of equals. Its raison d’être is the common enmity toward the growing Muslim presence in the West. The Far Right’s opposition to growing Muslim numbers in the West is obvious and understandable vis-à-vis the Great Replacement, while the Zionist anxiety is that Muslim voters will continue to pressure politicians to further distance their governments from the State of Israel.


This marriage of convenience begins to break down over time as more of the rank and file of the Far Right are exposed to theories about Jews controlling the political establishment and being the principal force behind the Great Replacement.


Already, influential figures on the Far Right like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens and Megyn Kelly have ruptured their previous association with Zionism, but others, like Nigel Farage and Tommy Robinson in the UK are still in the Zionist lobby’s pocket. Yet the trajectory is plainly in favor of a greater share of the Far Right leaders and influencers being either non-Zionist or outright anti-Zionist.


While Muslims are and will remain the primary target of popular discontent by not only the Far Right but even mainstream conservatives, other minority groups are targeted by them from time to time. A phase of “transphobia” lasted for some time largely driven by another marriage of convenience, this time between the Far Right and so-called TERF movement (Trans-exclusionary radical feminists). During the Covid-19 pandemic, East Asians were targeted. Subsequently, Indians, especially Hindus, were on the receiving end of a storm of online hate. Now, the senseless murder of Henry Nowak by a Sikh man, with his family members having committed accessory after the fact, results in the Sikh community facing some harmful backlash.


Muslims should not be hasty in jumping to defend or stand in solidarity with any other minority community that is targeted with bigotry by the Far Right. Firstly, we have to reserve whatever resources we have to combat the Far Right for ourselves. We are not in a position to be charitable to others in this sense. Secondly, these other minorities utterly failed to stand up for and show any solidarity with us Muslims since the onset of modern Islamophobia which essentially began in the aftermath of 9/11. On the contrary, significant elements within these other minorities often jump on the bandwagon of anti-Muslim hate, either to deflect hostility toward their own communities or because they genuinely hate us Muslims as much as the Far Right. This is especially true of Hindus, Sikhs, LGBTQ, Hispanics and even Blacks.


The Holy Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him and his family, famously said:

لاَ يُلْدَغُ الْمُؤْمِنُ مِنْ جُحْرٍ وَاحِدٍ مَرَّتَيْنِ

“The Believer is not stung from the same hole twice.”


It would be unwise for Muslims to pursue any political alliance with the Left in general, or specific other minority groups that have a history of backstabbing us, even as a means of pushing back against the Far Right juggernaut.


Now let us turn to a more uncomfortable and inconvenient truth. We Muslims are least partially to blame for the ascendancy of the Far Right and for giving them ammunition and justification to resent us. The rising trend of migrants from certain countries and backgrounds, confessing Islam as their religion while committing serious crimes, especially violence, rape, sexual assault and grooming, in which the victims are usually ordinary and innocent White people, will naturally fuel the flames that are engulfing us in the West. 


The most recent example of this trend is Hadi Alodid, a Black Sudanese migrant and asylum seeker who attempted to behead a local man openly on the streets of Belfast, severely maiming him in the process. Before this there was the Somali immigrant Essa Suleiman who stabbed two visibly Jewish men in the streets of London back in April of this year.


It seems there is a mental health crisis in a segment of the Muslim community coming from Africa, but also other places like Afghanistan, exemplified in the case of Rahmanullah Lakanwal, and Syria as exemplified in the case of Jihad al-Shamie. In fact, it is safe to say that most if not all the lone wolf terrorist attacks by Muslims in the West, including those committed in the name of ISIS, are not actually genuinely ideological but ultimately rooted in some mental health crisis of the perpetrator.


Yes, many of our youth are extremely upset about the genocide of our Palestinian brethren in Gaza at the hands of the barbaric Zionists, and the current wars being waged by the Americans and the Zionists in Iran and Lebanon. They lash out by attacking soft Jewish targets like synagogues and visibly Orthodox Jews here in the West. Such attacks, however, only expose their feeling of utter frustration, helplessness and despair. Aside from the obvious immorality of such actions, they accomplish nothing, rather give further ammunition to our enemies as a means of spreading anti-Muslim propaganda.

The energy of these restless teenagers, whose hormones are surging and whose frontal cortex hasn’t developed fully, needs to be channeled constructively. 


But it is the sexual aggression of some of our youth in the West directed against White women and girls that may be considered the greatest boon for the Far Right. Nathaniel Veltman, who murdered a Pakistani Muslim family in London, Ontario in June 2021, explained clearly that it was the Pakistani grooming gangs in the UK which so infuriated him, becoming his single motivation for committing his ghastly deed.


One cannot emphasize enough how shameful it is for us Muslims collectively to now be associated with the crimes of rape, sexual assault and grooming of especially young girls when we are meant to be the most disciplined and modest in this regard. When during the 2015-2016 New Year’s eve in Germany hundreds of Arab and North Africans youths committed large scale sexual assaults of young women, the public mood there quickly turned against the Muslim community. It significantly damaged the goodwill that was previously shown to especially Syrian refugees, a million of whom Germany agreed to allow into its borders.


Do we Muslims deserve this painful stigmatization of being predatory that is fueling the Far Right’s rise which will only marginalize us further? The ordinary Muslim in the West will realize soon enough how much of a persona non grata he or she has become. The community will suffer blatant discrimination in employment and housing. It is at least partially due to the disgusting culture of sexual harassment of women that is so prevalent among us Muslims and in our countries of origin.


I believe the principal cause of this sexual aggression of young Muslim, especially Arab men, is the phenomenon of delayed marriage. Islam strongly encourages marriage of both males and females as soon as they hit adolescence as a means of strengthening the community and preventing the spread of sexual immorality and fornication. The Muslim and Arab world has learned the hard way that delaying the marriage of their youths due to economic reasons has resulted in sexual immorality becoming so widespread. This is a tremendous topic which deserves a separate discussion of its own.


Far Right political parties have already achieved considerable success including the formation of and participation in governments in places like Italy and Finland. Donald Trump’s presidency and Elon Musk’s massive wallet will continue to serve the mainstreaming of the Far Right and its success in Europe. It is on a direct course to emerge triumphant in any future election held in the UK and France, and perhaps even Germany. Nigel Farage’s Reform Party is certainly slated to form the next government in the UK unless something drastic happens to prevent that in the foreseeable future. Now, more than ever, Muslims in the UK need to plan for that likelihood and produce a national strategy to survive in a climate of hate that will target our people first and foremost in a way that mirrors the total marginalization and stigmatization of Muslims in BJP governed India.

Monday, June 8, 2026

Lord between Worshiper and Qiblah

 بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

In the Name of Allah, the Rahman, the Merciful

الصلاة والسلام عليك يا سيدي يا رسول الله

Prayers and peace upon you, my Master, Apostle of Allah


Allah ذو الجلال says in the Suhuf al-Mutahharah:

فَاَیۡنَمَا تُوَلُّوۡا فَثَمَّ وَجۡہُ اللّٰہِ

So wherever you turn, there is the Face of Allah

(Surah 2, Ayah 115)


The revelatory context of this Ayah is concerning the Qiblah or direction of worship. Hence, the Holy Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم said concerning worship in the direction of the Qiblah:

إِنَّ رَبَّهُ بَيْنَهُ وَبَيْنَ الْقِبْلَةِ

“Verily, his Lord is between him and the Qiblah” (Sahih al-Bukhari)


According to the methodology of the heretical Mushabbihah and Mujassimah (those who resemble God to His creation or conceive of God as corporeal), the Hadith should be interpreted to mean that Allah is literally, in His Person, in a place between the worshipper and the Qiblah. In reality, however, the Mushabbihah and Mujassimah of our time do not dare say this. This matter exposes their inconsistency, for the Mushabbihah and Mujassimah insist that Allah is literally seated upon the Throne in Heaven with His Person.


Hence, the great Muhaddith, Ibn Hajr al-Asqalani رحمة الله عليه commenting on this Hadith, says:


وَفِيهِ الرَّدُّ عَلَى مَنْ زَعَمَ أَنَّهُ عَلَى الْعَرْشِ بِذَاتِهِ

“In it is a refutation of the one who claims that He [Allah] is upon the Throne in His Person” (Fath ul-Bari, v.2, p.133)




So the doctrine of orthodox Sunni Islam is that Allah exists, in His Person, without being contained or encompassed inside a location. The one who believes God is inside the cosmos or contained in a created space is guilty of the heresy known as Hulul (indwelling) or Imtizaj (mixture). In the Tahawi Creed, which is universally agreed upon by the Sunni Muslims, it is stated:


لَا تَحْوِيهِ الجِهَاتُ السِتُّ

“He [Allah] is not contained by the six directions” (al-Aqidat ut-Tahawiyyah, #48)


One of the objections raised against this is that the Quran and Sunnah repeatedly and emphatically state that Allah is above the Throne, that He is in Heaven, that the Messiah عليه السلام was raised up to Him in Heaven, that the Prophet Muhammad عليه الصلاة والسلام ascended the seven Heavens to meet with Him, etc.


The meaning of all of this is that the heavenly Throne is the place of the manifestation of the glory of Allah. It is the place of His Tajalli (theophany) where He manifests His glory, the glory of His presence. But it does not mean He is seated upon the Throne literally with His Person, as Ibn Hajr al-Asqalani explained.

Cow Sacrifice a Symbol of Islam

 بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

In the Name of Allah, the Rahman, the Merciful


الصلاة والسلام عليك يا رسول الله

Prayers and peace upon you, Apostle of Allah


Recently, a senior cleric of Deoband, Arshad Madani, may Allah eliminate him and his fitnah,  restated his demand that the cow be declared the “national animal” of India. This is the next step in the diabolical agenda of Deoband to enter reverence and worship of the cow into the hearts of the Muslims!

Initially, Deoband strongly advised Muslims to avoid cow sacrifice on the occasion of Eid al-Qurban, and cow slaughter in general, so as to avoid hurting Hindu sentiments. This is in stark contrast to the fatwa of the Sunni Mujaddid, Ala Hadrat, Imam Ahmad Rida Khan رحمة الله عليه  who wrote an entire paper on this issue titled انفس الفكر في قربان البقر in which he established, quite brilliantly, that the sacrifice and slaughter of cows becomes a religious obligation for the Muslims in the context in which the Hindu cow-worshipers seek to humiliate Islam by preventing that. Quoting a fatwa of the Ulama:

قربانی گائے کی شعار اسلام ہے اس کا موقوف کرنا بسبب ممانعت ہنود معصیت ہے

Cow sacrifice is a symbol of Islam. To halt it due to the Hindu prohibition is sinful (Fatawa Ridawiyyah, v.14, p.549)

Ala Hadrat, Imam Ahmad Rida Khan, may Allah have mercy on his blessed soul, restated this fact that cow sacrifice is a symbol of Islam (ibid, p.558)



So even though the Shari’ah does not mandate Muslims to sacrifice specifically cows on the occasion of Eid al-Qurban, and one is free to sacrifice camels, sheep and goats instead, it becomes a duty of the Muslims to sacrifice cows where and when their failure to do so is understood as appeasement of the Hindu cow-worshipers and idolaters.


Now appreciate the honor and jealousy that Ala Hadrat رحمة اللہ علیہ and the orthodox Sunni Ulama have for Allah and His Religion as opposed to the shamelessness and cowardice of Deoband.


The attitude of Deoband both surprises and disturbs me. It shows an utter failure to understand the spirit of Islam and the spirit of the message of the Holy Quran. The story of the resistance of the Israelites to God’s commandment through His Prophet Moses عليه السلام to slaughter a cow gives name to and is featured in the longest Surah of the Quran, al-Baqarah, which literally means the cow.


Deobandis and some other Muslims in India, in avoiding cow sacrifice and slaughter as a means of deference to the Hindus are similar to those cursed Israelites, who under the influence of their pagan neighbors, repeatedly relapsed into worship of the Golden Calf, and the worship of Baal, a Canaanite idol associated with the bull.


The wicked Israelite King Jeroboam had two golden calves constructed and placed one in Bethel and the other in Dan for his people to worship. Mind you this was centuries after the Israelites in the time of Moses and Aaron عليهما السلام had constructed the Golden Calf and worshiped it at the foot of Mount Sinai in the wilderness.


Likewise, the idolatrous influence of their Hindu ancestors and neighbors has poisoned the hearts of Deobandis and some other Muslims in India, compelling them to avoid cow sacrifice and slaughter.


Arshad Madani is the author of other scandals, such as declaring that Allah and Om are one. This was another diabolical attempt of his to reconcile Islam with the idolatrous and satanic Hindu religious.


It should be borne in mind that Arshad Madani is not some obscure cleric, but the head of the Jami’at Ulama-i-Hind (JUH), the principal face of Deoband in the public affairs of India. He is the son of Hussain Ahmad Madani, a major figure in the Deobandi movement, who introduced the wrong concept of composite nationalism to the Muslims of India, arguing that Muslims and Hindus form a single nation and that Muslims must remain loyal to India as their motherland.


Khalid Rashid of Firangi Mahal and Umar Ilyasi are other contemporary clerics in India who, like Deoband, kowtow to the Hindus. Umar Ilyasi, may Allah eliminate him and his fitnah, shamelessly participated in the disgraceful consecration of the Ram Janmbhumi temple in Ayodhya on the 22nd of January, 2024. This idolatrous temple was constructed on the ruins of the martyred and demolished Babri Masjid.

Before the establishment of the school of Deoband, the Sunni Muslims of the Subcontinent were united in their creed and practice of Islam. They venerated the Saints and Sufis, visiting their tombs to pray for them and obtain spirituality through nearness to their bones. They celebrated the Mawlid—the Prophet Muhammad’s blessed birthday, peace be upon him. They openly proclaimed “Ya Nabi Salam Alaika”. Those Islamic institutions which predate the Deobandi school and have managed to survive to the present bear witness to this fact. Consider the iconic Jama Masjid in Delhi, which was built by the Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan in the mid 17th century. He invited Sayyid Abd ul-Ghafur Shah of Bukhara, in present day Uzbekistan, to inaugurate the Mosque and serve as its khatib and royal imam. His descendants continue to serve as royal imams for this special and beautiful mosque till this day. They are traditional, orthodox and mainstream Sunni Muslims who have nothing to do with the newer schismatic movements that emerged during the British colonial period, such as Deoband and the so-called Ahl ul-Hadith or Salafism.

Hussain Ahmad Madani (1879-1957)

Arshad Madani
Mahmud Madani
Khalid Rashid of Farangi Mahal
Umar Ilyasi
Muslims in India should beware of these charlatans who are using the garb of Islam to hoodwink them into kowtowing to the Hindus and going along with the diabolical agenda of Hindutva.

Sunday, June 7, 2026

The Missing Books of the Bible

 بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

In the Name of Allah, the Rahman, the Merciful

الصلاة والسلام عليك يا رسول الله

Prayers and peace upon you, Apostle of Allah


As I have already explained, my position, as a Sunni Muslim, to the Bible is a balanced and nuanced one in contrast to some of the Muslim debaters and apologists who focus on refuting and debating Christians. In my view, the Bible is, for the most part, a faithful record of the original revelation and Scriptures that God revealed to various Israelite Prophets. The Holy Quran not only testifies of the Torah, the Zabur (Psalms of David) and the Injil (Evangel or Gospel given to Jesus), it also confirms the Scriptures in general:


أَوَلَمْ تَأْتِهِم بَيِّنَةُ مَا فِي الصُّحُفِ الْأُولَىٰ

Has there not come to them clarification of that which is in the former Scriptures?

(Surah 20, Ayah 133)


I understand as-Suhuf al-Ula (prior Scriptures) as a reference to not only the Torah, or not only the Torah, Psalms and Gospel of Jesus, but also the Scriptures inspired to various other Israelite Prophets, such as Joshua, Samuel, Job, King Solomon, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Jonah, and even the so-called “minor Prophets” like Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi. Whether the Scriptures attributed to the names of Joshua, Samuel, Job, Jonah and others are a record of their inspirations and visions, or merely a historical account of their prophetic ministries, their contents are surely true, or at the very least do not conflict with the Holy Quran. This is also true of other books in the Bible such as the Book of Kings and Chronicles, which although read more as accounts of history than actual revealed Scripture to a Prophet, nonetheless contain, from an Islamic perspective, mostly true and correct information.


I go even further and argue that the much of the Talmud, in its relaying of historical events, teachings and laws, is also true and correct from an Islamic perspective, and have been confirmed in the Holy Quran and the Sunnah. The Rabbinic Jewish doctrine that at Mount Sinai Moses received both a written Torah and an unwritten or oral Torah, is also correct from an Islamic perspective, though virtually all Christians and even many Muslims reject this.


Yet, it must also be acknowledged that the current Biblical canon is incomplete, and there were several other texts that were either omitted or genuinely lost. The Bible itself references some of these texts, for instance:


1. Book of the Wars of the Lord (mentioned in Numbers 21:14)


2. Book of Jasher (mentioned in Joshua 10:13; 2 Samuel 1:18)


3. Book of the Acts of Solomon (1 Kings 11:41)


4. Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel (mentioned in 1 Kings and 2 Kings)


5. Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah (mentioned in 1 Kings and 2 Kings)


6. Book of Samuel the Seer (mentioned in 1 Chronicles 29:29)


7. Book of Nathan the Prophet (mentioned in 1 Chronicles 29:29; 2 Chronicles 9:29)


8. Book of Gad the Seer (mentioned in 1 Chronicles 29:29)


9. Book of Ahijah the Shilonite (mentioned in 2 Chronicles 9:29)


10. Visions of Iddo the Seer (mentioned in 2 Chronicles 9:29, 12:15, 13:22)


11. Book of Shemaiah the Prophet (mentioned in 2 Chronicles 12:15)


12. Book of Jehu son of Hanani (mentioned in 2 Chronicles 20:34)


13. Sayings of the Seers (mentioned in 2 Chronicles 33:19)


It should be especially concerning to Christians and Jews that there were Scriptures attributed to several Prophets, namely,  Nathan, Gad, Ahijah, Iddo, Shemaiah, and Jehu, which are not found in their canon.

Revenge of the Far Right

  بِسۡمِ اللّٰہِ الرَّحۡمٰنِ الرَّحِیۡمِ In the Name of Allah, the Rahman, the Merciful Racial, ethnic and religious tensions are currently ...