Angel Gabriel Appearing to Prophet Muhammad at the Mountain

 بِسۡمِ اللّٰہِ الرَّحۡمٰنِ الرَّحِیۡمِ

In the Name of Allah, the Rahman, the Merciful

الصلاة والسلام عليك يا سيدي يا رسول الله

Salutations and peace upon you, my master, Apostle of Allah

Only two Angels are mentioned in the Bible by name, and they are the Archangels Gabriel and Michael. In the Old Testament, they are only mentioned by name in the Book of Daniel. In the New Testament, the Angel Gabriel appeared to both Zechariah and the virgin Mary, as mentioned in the first chapter of the Gospel according to Luke, while the Angel Michael is mentioned in the Book of Revelation as the general who led the Angelic forces in battle against Satan and his minions, driving them out of Heaven. These two Archangels are mentioned by name in the Holy Quran too, for instance:

مَن كَانَ عَدُوًّا لِّلَّهِ وَمَلَائِكَتِهِ وَرُسُلِهِ وَجِبْرِيلَ وَمِيكَالَ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ عَدُوٌّ لِّلْكَافِرِينَ

Whoever is an enemy to Allah and His Angels and His Apostles and Gabriel and Michael—then indeed, Allah is an enemy to the disbelievers

(Surah 2, Ayah 98)

It is not a coincidence that these two Angels which alone are mentioned by name in the Bible are the two principal Angels in Islam too. They are strongly associated with the Holy Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, during his prophetic ministry. They could be seen fighting on his right and on his left in battle, often clothed in pure white garments, looking radiant and majestic. When invoking Allah, the Prophet would often refer to Him as the "Lord of Gabriel and Michael".

But the antichrist and false prophet Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian, however, claimed to receive revelations, visions and visitations of Angels with strange names through which we come to know that he was a liar, and that those were not true Angels. Mirza spoke of Angels allegedly named "Tichi Tichi", "Darshani", "Khairati", "Mithan Lal" and "Sher Ali".

According to the Bible, when Jesus was led into the wilderness to be tempted by the Devil, "Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple, And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone" (Matthew 4:5-6; Luke 4:9-11).

This is quite similar to what reportedly happened to the Holy Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him:

ثُمَّ لَمْ يَنْشَبْ وَرَقَةُ أَنْ تُوُفِّيَ وَفَتَرَ الْوَحْىُ فَتْرَةً حَتَّى حَزِنَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فِيمَا بَلَغَنَا حُزْنًا غَدَا مِنْهُ مِرَارًا كَىْ يَتَرَدَّى مِنْ رُءُوسِ شَوَاهِقِ الْجِبَالِ فَكُلَّمَا أَوْفَى بِذِرْوَةِ جَبَلٍ لِكَىْ يُلْقِيَ مِنْهُ نَفْسَهُ تَبَدَّى لَهُ جِبْرِيلُ فَقَالَ يَا مُحَمَّدُ إِنَّكَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ حَقًّا فَيَسْكُنُ لِذَلِكَ جَأْشُهُ وَتَقِرُّ نَفْسُهُ فَيَرْجِعُ فَإِذَا طَالَتْ عَلَيْهِ فَتْرَةُ الْوَحْىِ غَدَا لِمِثْلِ ذَلِكَ فَإِذَا أَوْفَى بِذِرْوَةِ جَبَلٍ تَبَدَّى لَهُ جِبْرِيلُ فَقَالَ لَهُ مِثْلَ ذَلِكَ

Then, not long after Waraqah died, and the revelation ceased for a period, until the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, became so distressed, as we have been told, that he repeatedly considered throwing himself from the mountain peaks. Each time he reached the summit of a mountain to throw himself off, Gabriel would appear to him and say, "O Muhammad, you are truly the Messenger of God," and his heart would be calmed and his soul would find peace. Then he would return, and if the period of revelation had been long for him, he would go again the next day for the same purpose. When he reached the summit of a mountain, Gabriel would appear to him and say the same thing to him (Sahih al-Bukhari)

Although the Devil was trying to convince our Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, to throw himself from the cliff of the mountain, he never did so as the Angel Gabriel would appear to him and reassure him.

Some people have objected to this account, saying it is not possible that the Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, could ever intend to commit suicide. While their objection bears merit, especially considering that it is in fact the irsal of Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri and not the narration of Umm al-Mu'minin A'ishah, may Allah be pleased with her.

Yet I do not necessarily find the story objectionable since it says that the Prophet, peace be upon him, did not throw himself from the mountain, but like Jesus was merely tempted to do so, a temptation he successfully resisted. 

And the story states that the Angel Gabriel would appear to the Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, when he reached the summit of the mountain, and would reassure him by saying "O Muhammad! You are truly the Messenger of Allah".

If the story is true, and there is a likelihood it is, I understand it to mean that during long pauses in the revelation, the Holy Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, desirous to see the Angel, would climb the summit of the mountain but in reality he had no intention of committing suicide as he knew the Angel would appear to him, and surely he did appear to him. And Allah and His Apostle know best!

How Feminism is Destroying the Muslim World

 بِسۡمِ اللّٰہِ الرَّحۡمٰنِ الرَّحِیۡمِ

In the Name of Allah, the Rahman, the Merciful

الصلاة والسلام عليك يا سيدي يا رسول الله

Salutations and peace upon you, my master, Apostle of Allah

For some time there has been a diabolical conspiracy to spread the poison of feminism and Western/European culture in the Muslim Ummah. The hostile enemies of Islam are behind this conspiracy, but its success lies in their mantle being taken up by feminists and liberals within our own community. But unlike the latter, the former know quite well that feminism and its call to women's empowerment and liberation is the most effective weapon to weaken Islam and rip apart the fabric of Muslim society.

The leftists of various shades assert they are working for the sovereignty of the Muslim world from Neo-imperialism, but they too advocate for the false gospel of feminism and women's liberation which is more effective and faster at disintegrating Muslim society than any form of political subjugation by a foreign entity. It is shocking to me that today many if not most of the Muslims are more concerned with the geopolitical subjugation of the Muslims, whether it is through Zionism or the wars America is constantly waging in the Middle East, than they are with the moral corruption that runs deep in our societies and specifically the sexual immorality that is so widespread. The younger generations have by and large turned away from strict Islamic traditions and conservative values with regard to veiling, gender segregation and preventing exposure to Western pop culture.

Even those that identify with the conservative and traditional current cannot help but be stained by modernity and its "progressive" values. The form of veiling that is considered "Islamic" today, by and large, is in fact a significant departure from the letter and spirit of the Shari'ah, while the complete covering and seclusion of women is pejoratively dubbed "Talibanization". That is a manifest indication that in reality the forces of conservatism are on the retreat in the face of the feminist and liberal reformist onslaught.

Allah, holy and exalted is He, says:

وَقَرْنَ فِي بُيُوتِكُنَّ وَلَا تَبَرَّجْنَ تَبَرُّجَ الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ الْأُولَىٰ

Stay in your houses and do not make a display of the display of the former time of ignorance

(Surah 33, Ayah 33)

Islam not only teaches veiling and segregation of women, but encourages them to stay at home. The entire system of schooling, and the phenomenon of women having jobs and careers outside the home is contrary to the spirit of Hijab and modesty. In this regard I must admit that the only place where the spirit of Hijab and modesty is correctly being observed today is Afghanistan. Those who allege that it is not Islam but "backwards" Pashtun tribal culture are sorely wrong. It is the ethos of pure Islam which was once widespread throughout the Muslim World but today has become limited to the blessed land of Afghanistan, and perhaps a few other remote places like Yemen and Hadramawt.

I have no doubt that the repression of the Palestinians at the hands of the Zionist menace, and now their neighbors in Lebanon is largely due to the corruption of the womenfolk.

The poison of feminism and "women's liberation" has been totally harmful to the sacred institution of marriage, the bedrock of the family and therefore of society. The Arab attitude toward marriage was already one that perceived it more as contractual than sacred. Adding feminism and modern liberalism to the mix has resulted in nearly half of all marriages ending in divorce in Kuwait as an instance. Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, the Emirates and Lebanon are not far behind, where the divorce rate in these countries range from a third of all marriages to forty percent of them. This despite my Master the Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, having said:

أَبْغَضُ الْحَلاَلِ إِلَى اللَّهِ الطَّلاَقُ

"The most hated of the Halal to Allah is divorce"

Contrast this with the divorce rate in predominantly Hindu India, which is 0.1%! And in neighboring Bangladesh it has not exceeded 1%. Some Arabs deride Subcontinental culture as un-Islamic, but at least with regard to its attitude on marriage it is surely closer to Islam. Muslims and especially Arabs should be ashamed of themselves that compared to Hindus we are a people who have made a mockery of the sacred institute of marriage.

A major factor in the skyrocketing divorce rates in the Muslim and Arab world is the granting of the key to terminate a marriage into the hand of the woman. Whereas the injunction of the Shari'ah is that only the husband may unilaterally divorce, and if a woman seeks a khul' her husband must willingly consent to it for it to be valid. The result is that so many of our women, who have separated from their husband without a valid khul' and then married someone else are in fact not in matrimony but living in adultery, producing bastard children!

Another issue is so-called "marital rape". Even in the United States, "marital rape" was not recognized and therefore not illegal in all fifty states until as recently as 1993. Islam, however, maintains that "marital rape" is an oxymoron, since marriage is an agreement to lifetime consent. This does not mean it is wise or ethical for a man to coerce his wife if she is unwilling, but that if he does so it can by no means be considered rape or a punishable crime. The Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, said that if a woman is called by her husband to the bed and she refuses him, the Angels continuously curse her till morning, and Heaven is displeased with her until her husband becomes pleased with her again. Note that he, peace be upon him, never advised the husband to simply coerce his own wife. He, peace be upon him, said:

إِذَا الرَّجُلُ دَعَا زَوْجَتَهُ لِحَاجَتِهِ فَلْتَأْتِهِ وَإِنْ كَانَتْ عَلَى التَّنُّورِ

"If a man calls his wife to fulfill his need she should go to him even if she is (occupied) at the oven" (Jami al-Tirmidhi)

Therefore, unless a wife has a valid excuse such as having her period—in which state sexual relations are strictly forbidden—or illness, she must always answer the call of her husband.

The feminists argue that such attitudes are patriarchal and backwards, but in reality they are the recipe for a happy and successful marriage, upon which the family and society thrives.

This is not to totally exonerate the males of our community from responsibility for the rising tide of marital breakdowns and collapse of the family. In many instances they either share the blame with their wife for the souring of the marriage or are in fact exclusively responsible for it. Specifically, the laxity in religious observance—the five daily Salah—and staying away from those matters that are explicitly forbidden in our Religion.

There is an evil and filthy invasion of pornography into the homes and devices of some of the Muslims which often leads to the destruction of marital life. Allah says,

قُل لِّلْمُؤْمِنِينَ يَغُضُّوا مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِمْ وَيَحْفَظُوا فُرُوجَهُمْ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ أَزْكَىٰ لَهُمْ

Say to the Believers to subdue their gaze and protect their private parts. That is purer for them

(Surah 24, Ayah 30)

But the men of our community openly and shamelessly stare at women in public. Some of them put forward the excuse that intently lowering their gaze when a woman addresses them will likely be perceived as rude or awkward. But is perceived rudeness and awkwardness in this brief worldly sojourn not preferable to having to hang one's head in utter shame and extreme terror before Allah on Judgment Day?

Apparently, domestic violence is a considerably serious problem in our community. The feminist passionately and loudly screams that even the slightest form of domestic violence calls for not only immediate breaking up of the relationship but also calling the police to arrest the husband and charge him with a criminal offense that should lead to imprisonment. Let no one think I am justifying any kind of domestic abuse, but the feminist response to it is just as—if not more—destructive. The priority must always be to salvage the marriage and the family, even if at times that seems like a remote possibility. Are there not better alternatives, in the long run, to terminating the marriage or involving the police? 

Allah says,

وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ شِقَاقَ بَيْنِهِمَا فَابْعَثُوا حَكَمًا مِّنْ أَهْلِهِ وَحَكَمًا مِّنْ أَهْلِهَا إِن يُرِيدَا إِصْلَاحًا يُوَفِّقِ اللَّهُ بَيْنَهُمَا

If you fear dissension between them both then send an arbiter from his family and an arbiter from her family. If they desire reconciliation then Allah will bring about agreement between them both

(Surah 4, Ayah 35)

Thus the first and best course of action to solve the problem of domestic violence or abuse is always resorting to reconciliation by means of arbitration between the two families. Only in such an extreme scenario when the husband obstinately refuses to mend his ways despite the threat of breakup should his wife seek a nullification of the marriage in the courts. 

Therapy and marriage counseling especially with the help of the elders and religious leaders of the community are better at mending the marriage and bringing about blessing in it as opposed to seeking its dissolution resulting in a broken family. Studies are fairly consistent in showing that single mother households often result in the children going wayward or becoming unsuccessful in life.

One need only look at the state of the family today in Western civilization, and especially the broken families in certain minority communities in the West such as Blacks and Indigenous people. The enemies of Islam are pushing this agenda of feminism in the Muslim world with the objective of having our state mirror theirs. 

Thankfully, the phenomenon of producing children out of wedlock is still a major stigma in even the more liberal sections of our community, but who can say our proceeding generations will not stigmatize it? The feminist mindset is ultimately one that is skeptical and disapproving of the institute of marriage altogether. The more radical feminists seek to eventually abolish it forever, viewing it—and perhaps correctly so—as a fundamentally patriarchal social phenomenon.

We Muslims living as a minority in the West witness the destruction of the family and the spread of sexual immorality as a consequence of this civilization having swallowed hook, line and sinker the principles of feminism. But our low IQ brethren in the Muslim world pushing for "women's liberation" are intellectually incapable of appreciating the consequences of that which they call to for the institutions of marriage and family.

Downfall of Abdullah Hashem and AROPL

 بِسۡمِ اللّٰہِ الرَّحۡمٰنِ الرَّحِیۡمِ

In the Name of Allah, the Rahman, the Merciful

الصلاة والسلام عليك يا سيدي يا رسول الله

Salutations and peace upon you, my master, Apostle of Allah

We Muslims rejoice at the arrest of the cursed antichrist known as Abdullah Hashem or Aba al-Sadiq, which happened on Wednesday, April 29, 2026, in the town of Crewe in the United Kingdom.

He along with several of his followers were charged with sexual abuse, forced marriage and modern slavery. Abdullah Hashem founded a new religion dubbed the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light, or AROPL.

Crewe is the site of Webb House, a large compound that was formerly an orphanage and was purchased by this cult as their new headquarters and a place for their communal living. There were reportedly about 150 cult members, including women and children, living at Webb House along with Abdullah Hashem. 

The raid conducted by the police to detain Abdullah Hashem and some of his high ranking followers involved some five hundred police officers, and was based on information provided by a woman who was formerly a member of this cult. There are allegations of rape and child sexual abuse against this cult and it's diabolical leader, which will surely be tested in court. Hopefully justice prevails and through convictions this cult extinguishes rapidly.

The Antichrist Ahmad al-Hasan ("Yamani")

The Antichrist Abdullah Hashem (Aba al-Sadiq)

Its origin lies in Iraq with an individual known as Ahmad al-Hasan who claimed to be an eschatological figure called the Yamani. Apparently, this individual has died, but some of his followers are running an office and movement in his name based in Najaf, Iraq. Abdullah Hashem and his group also claim Ahmad al-Hasan and condemn their rivals in Najaf.

The so-called Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light may be characterized as heavily influenced by past heresies of various Ghali Shi'ite heresiarchs. Abdullah Hashem glazes the likes of the Yemenite Jew who feigned Islam in order to sabotage it from within, namely, Abdullah bin Saba. He also praised Abul-Khattab al-Asadi, who claimed to be a prophet of Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq, whom he declared God incarnate, and Muhammad bin Nusayr, founder of the so-called Alawite sect which believe, as Ibn Saba taught, that Ali bin Abi Talib, radi Allahu anhu, is God incarnate!

Abdullah Hashem teaches that the heresiarch Abul-Khattab is an incarnation of the ninth Mahdi (The Goal of the Wise, p.164), and that Muhammad bin Nusayr is an incarnation of the third Mahdi (ibid, p.163).

According to Abdullah Hashem, Ibn Saba did teach that Ali al-Murtada, radi Allahu anhu, is God incarnate and for this reason Mawla Ali, radi Allahu anhu, ordered his execution by means of being thrown in a blazing ditch. Abdullah Hashem says that when the verdict of being burnt alive was passed against Ibn Saba he began to jump up and down out of excitement, for in his mind it served as a signal that Ali radi Allahu anhu considered himself God, for only the Lord of fire is authorized to punish humans with fire!

Like Ibn Saba, the Egyptian Abdullah Hashem went to Egypt to stir dissension in that country against the government. Abdullah Hashem mentions at the beginning of his book, the Mahdi's Manifesto, that he participated in the Arab Spring protests that resulted in the overthrowing of President Hosni Mubarak in 2011.

Abdullah Hashem was also a filmmaker who helped produce a documentary called the Arrivals. He apparently investigated cults before he decided to start his own, having learned the ins and outs of how a cult should properly function in order to attract a following.

The basic heresy of the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light, after its gross idolatry and polytheism, can be summarized in their teaching of a "seventh covenant" which abrogates the Shari'ah of the Holy Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم.

Abdullah Hashem attributes the announcement and details of this covenant from what was conveyed to him by Ahmad al-Hasan the "Yamani".

These "Ahmadis" believe that the following were true prophets of God: "1. Buddha 2. Krishna 3. Confucius 4. Lao Tzu 5. Zeus 6. Osiris 7. Socrates 8. Aristotle 9. Plato 10. Alexander the Great 11. Mani 12. Pythagoras 13. Saint Augustine 14. Arnobius of Sicca 15. Plotinus 16. Ammonius Saccas 17. King Artaxerxes 18. Odin 19. Donatus Magnus 20. Cyrus the Great 21. Zoroaster 22. King Philip of Macedonia 23. Al-Lat 24. Al-Uzza 25. Manat 26. Arjuna 27. Horus 28. Obaid Al-Haddad of Iraq 29. Heem of Iraq 30. Adrahan of Iraq 31. Ozra Ouri of Iraq 32. Abdel Malik of Iraq 33. Theodosius II 34. Darius 35. Amid of Egypt" (The Goal of the Wise, pp.108-109)

As you can see, the AROPL cult consider many false gods and idols, from ancient Egyptian, Greek, Hindu and Norse mythology and even the pagan Arab idols of Lat, Uzza and Manat to have been prophets of God! Abdullah Hashem says, "This means that every religion from the ancient Egyptian mystery religions to the ancient Greek religions to Buddhism, Hinduism, and Manichaeism are all based on true revelations from God" (ibid, p.109).

Yet he falsifies Islam by attributing the following statement to Ahmad al-Hasan "ninety-nine percent of religion is wrong, not ninety-nine percent of all religions, ninety-nine percent of each religion, even Islam." (Ibid, p.110)

Abdullah Hashem and his cult are therefore clearly not Muslim and have nothing to do with Islam, as he himself confesses, "A new Islam means that the Islam that the Riser/Qaim brings shall be almost entirely different than the Islam that Mohammed (PBUH & His Family) came with and the Islam that is currently practiced today. Essentially, it is a new religion." (Ibid, p.113)

This blasphemous and satanic "Seventh Covenant" apparently begins with the destruction of the Mosques and Mausoleums of the Muslims, "the Riser/Qaim shall command that the mosques and mausoleums of the Muslims all be demolished…It will appear to the people that the Qaim/Riser is trying to erase the religion of Islam." (Ibid)

The sacrilege gets worse, as according to Abdullah Hashem, the Qaim, whom he identifies as himself, has been tasked with destroying the sacred Ka'bah itself and even the grave of the Holy Prophet!

"Not only does the Qaim/Riser destroy the Kaaba itself and the ‘Grand Mosque of Mecca’, he also heads to Medina to destroy the Mosque and grave of the Prophet of Allah (PBUH & His

Family)." (Ibid, p.114)

What other comment can I make except to say that may Allah curse this pig, undoubtedly the son of a pig, named Abdullah Hashem.

Once again my thesis that these heretical groups pose a danger to the physical security of the Muslims is proven true. They claim theirs is a religion of "peace and light" but in reality it seeks to destroy our sacred shrines, mosques and even the very grave of the Holy Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم, the holiest and most sacred place in the entire universe! I have no doubt that Abdullah Hashem is a rapist and child molester and he is about to be exposed as such to the whole world in a court of law.

Another heresy of this "Seventh Covenant" and so-called Ahmadi cult is the belief that we Muslims have a false Ka'bah and that the true Ka'bah is in Petra, Jordan (ibid, p.115).

This ridiculous idea was first proposed by Dan Gibson on the basis that some early mosques face in the direction of Petra rather than Mecca and so that must have been the original Qiblah!

In other words, a mere human error in constructing mosques at a time when the compass was not yet invented is sufficient to dismiss the mountains of evidence for conspiracy theory meant purely for sensationalism and publicity. Even the secular historians and experts on Islamic history dismiss Dan Gibson's claims as outlandish and worthless, especially since it conveniently ignores many other early mosques that are oriented toward Mecca.

The "Seventh Covenant" abolishes the traditional lunar calendar of the Muslims and claims that the original calendar is solar. The cult teaches that Ramadan corresponds to December and Dhul-Hijjah to September. Even if some of the names of these months correspond to a certain season, such as Rabi al-Awwal and Rabi al-Thani, or Ramadan which means something like intense heat, it may indicate that the Arabs had a lunisolar calendar with intercalary month or months prior to Islam. But the Islamic Shari'ah certainly institutes a purely lunar calendar, which the cult has abrogated, thus confirming its departure from the Ummah. This illustrates the extreme importance of the lunar calendar for the Ummah and how altering or changing it is heresy.

The modernist trend of our time that has replaced visible moon sighting with a calendar based on astronomical calculations is no small matter. It is a direct challenge to Islamic orthodoxy and the mainstream Sunni community. 

The Jews split into various sects on this matter. Although they follow a lunisolar calendar with an intercalary month added regularly every couple of years, the Karaites still stick to visible moon sighting to determine the beginning and ending of the month, while Rabbinic/Talmudic Jews and Samaritans have a fixed calendar based on astronomical calculation. The Qumran community in early antiquity associated with the Dead Sea Scrolls, however, followed a strictly solar calendar.

Thus Allah has given this Ummah through the Holy Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, a strictly lunar calendar, with the beginning and end of months based on visible moon sighting, to distinguish this Ummah from the others. Any departure from our calendar is essentially a departure from the Millah and the establishment of a new and separate community distinct from Muslims.

The "Ahmadi" cult of Abdullah Hashem fast in the month of December, and their fasting is different from ours as after sunset they refrain from eating any meat and any fruit whatsoever throughout the month, and also refrain from any sexual intercourse throughout the month, whereas our Shari'ah has permitted eating meat and fruit when breaking the fast at sunset, and likewise having intercourse with one's wife after sunset during Ramadan.

The "Ahmadi" cult of Abdullah Hashem has abolished another important institution in Islam, namely, the obligation for women to veil. Their "Seventh Covenant" permits women to unveil.

Permitting women to unveil is certainly opening the door to indecency, sexual immorality and corruption. This is blatantly obvious in the fact that now the cult leader and his high ranking aides were all arrested and charged with offenses of committing sexual abuse.

If any person comes along and introduces a teaching that seeks to loosen the Islamic laws regarding modesty and veiling, know that such a person is of the devil. Sikhism too criticized and abolished the Islamic injunction of veiling of women and gender segregation. From this we come to know that Sikhism is a satanic religion and not from God. The same may be said of the Baha'i cult, another satanic religion founded by a false prophet and apostate from Islam.

Abdullah Hashem, in the name of his satanic "Seventh Covenant" has also abolished the Islamic method of Salah, the five daily worship that consists of standing, bowing, and prostrating, invoking the same rationale as the Batinis (esotericists) who reinterpret the meaning of Salah. He says that Fajr means the wilayah of the (fictional) Twelfth Imam, Dhuhr is the wilayah of Ahmad al-Hasan (so-called "Yamani"), Asr is his own wilayah, while Maghrib and Isha refer to the wilayah of the succeeding "Mahdis" (ibid, p.119).

Given these major heresies and abolitions of basic Islamic laws, it is not surprising that the AROPL cult likewise abolishes the punishment for theft in Islam—cutting the hand of the thief, "The Riser/Qaim in the Seventh Covenant reveals corruptions in the Qur’an and the holy books and restores the truth in them. He abolishes certain medieval practices such as cutting off the hands of the thief in Islam. This archaic practice has nothing to do with the divine laws of God." (ibid, p.120)

More egregious than this, although again unsurprising, is the license to drink wine and get intoxicated: "The drinking of wine (sharab) is permissible in the Seventh Covenant as it was in pre-Mohammedan Covenants." (Ibid, p.121)

While not absolutely prohibited like in Islam, the religions of Judaism and many Christian churches do impose restrictions on drunkenness. Therefore, Abdullah Hashem is deceiving the people by claiming his license to drink wine without restriction is a restoration of its permissibility in "pre-Mohammedan Covenants". 

The Bible says, "Look not thou upon the wine when it is red, when it giveth his colour in the cup, when it moveth itself aright. At the last it biteth like a serpent, and stingeth like an adder" (Proverbs 23:31-32), "And be not drunk with wine" (Ephesians 5:18), "Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God" (Galatians 5:21), "Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God" (1 Corinthians 6:10). For this reason, certain fundamentalist and independent Baptist churches have a prohibitionist position on any consumption of alcohol.

The cursed antichrist Abdullah Hashem argues that wine is not impure as there will be rivers of wine in Heaven which the Believers will drink and enjoy (The Goal of the Wise, p.121), conveniently ignoring the fact that the wine in Paradise will not have the intoxicating property and is therefore unlike the impure wine of this world that God has forbidden absolutely. It is quite evident the drunkard, rapist and child molester Abdullah Hashem has permitted wine for his own desire and lust, and that is sufficient to reject him and his cult as satanic.

The cursed antichrist Abdullah Hashem invites homosexuals, the so-called LGBTQ community, to join his cult, and says he completely welcomes, embraces and loves them! He says, "our religion and our congregations welcome homosexuals and people from all walks and ways of life." (Ibid, p.41)

Abdullah Hashem said, "We refuse to issue a fatwa to say that the very act even--I'm going to take it a little bit further today you know since this thing has been brought up way too much. I'm going to say that I'm going to refuse even to issue a verdict or fatwa that says that the very act of homosexuality it itself is haram. I'm not going to do that today because we in our faith, in our religion we believe that there were several covenants that have been established throughout history. We believe that every time a covenant takes place, a new covenant is established, the laws of the previous covenant were nullified, right, or a lot of them are nullified and new laws are established. And so you'll find things that were once impermissible becoming permissible and vice versa...so I think that there's much room to still discuss and there's still a lot that will be spoken about in terms of this particular topic and I think that it is wrong and it's not correct and I will not just put a blanket statement today or tomorrow that says that the act of homosexuality is impermissible full stop." 

So the homosexualist Abdullah Hashem, may he be cursed and may he be sent to Hell quickly, has been exposed and has been humiliated by our mighty God, the Lord of Heaven and Earth.