In the Name of Allah, the
Entirely Merciful, the Especially Merciful
Salutations of Peace and
Blessings upon our Beloved Prophet and Master Muhammad and upon His Family and
Progeny
In a previous entry I exposed
Mawdudi's cynical view of the Muslim Umma, regarding whom he said: ''They
cannot distinguish between Islam and non-Islam'' (Musalman aur Mojuda Siasi
Kashmakash, p. 26). Mawdudi in fact considered himself and his small Jama'at
as the only ones who truly understand the reality and spirit of Islam:
اور یہی جہالت ہم ایک نہایت قلیل جماعت کے سوا مشرق سے لے کر مغرب تک مسلمانوں
میں عام دیکھ رہے ہیں، خواہ وہ ان پڑھ عوام ہوں، یا دستار بند علماء یا خرقہ پوش
مشائخ، یا کالجوں اور یونیورٹیوں کے تعلیم یافتہ حضرات۔ ان سب کے خیالات اور طور
طریقے ایک دوسرے بدرجہا مختلف ہیں، مگر اسلام کی حقیقت اور اس کی روح سے ناواقف
ہونے میں یہ سب یکساں ہیں۔
''Except for an extremely small
Jama'at, we see this ignorance widespread among the Muslims from East to West.
Whether they are the illiterate masses, turbaned Ulama, patched-frock wearing
(Sufi) Masha'ikh, or college or university educated gentlemen; their ideas and
behavior may be different from each other, but they are all united in having no
understanding of Islam's reality and its spirit.'' (Tafhimat; v. 1, p.
45)
These statements of Mawdudi
reveal his exclusivist attitude and contempt for the general body of the Muslim
Umma. This mass Tajhil of the Muslim Umma from the likes of Mawdudi and
those affected by his Fikr, such as Syed Qutb is in fact what gave rise to the contemporary
Fitna of mass Takfir (excommunication) of whole Muslim societies
by the radical Jama'aat (groups). While it is certainly true that at
present the majority of the Muslim Umma may be characterized as negligent in
their duties to Allah, and as having nowhere near the level of faith and piety
of previous generations of Muslims, there is a fine line between understanding
this reality and making either Tajhil or worse, Takfir, of whole Muslim societies.
Though Mawdudi has not explicitly made Takfir of the Muslim Umma, he accuses
all of the Muslims, with the self-serving exception of his own Jama'at, of
being totally ignorant of the reality of Islam. This is a dangerous view which logically
leads to the attitude of Takfir and Khuruj.
He did not say regarding his own jamaat but rather in a sense of "a small group of Muslims".
ReplyDeleteAnd maulana maududi never advocated for radicalism but rather advocated for non violent struggle to establish the deen. Khwarijism dates way back. It was there, from the time of sahaba r.a
And according to him who is that tiny group if it is not his own Jama'at? The point is Mawdudi disparaged the the Sawad al-A'zam, even though there are narrations which teach to stick to the Sawad al-A'zam, the main body of the Ummah. Mawdudi may not have been violent but his teachings were extremism because he was opposed to the way of the mainstream, orthodox Muslims (Sunnis)
Delete