بسم الله الرحمـن الرحيم
الصلوة والسلام على من لا نبى بعده
A certain
doubt that has become lodged in the minds of some Muslims is concerning the
legitimacy of the government of a non-Quraishi or even a non-Alid
(descendant of the Prophet ﷺ through his
cousin and son-in-law, Ali b. Abi TalibRA). Without a doubt, the
position of Ahlus Sunnati wal-Jama’a is that it is ideal and preferable that the
government and administration of the Muslims be given to the Quraish. The
history of early Islam informs us that the believing Muslims particularly
desired and looked to the Alids to establish their temporal authority in
the land. They were even rendered material support to this end in launching
armed uprisings against the various tyrannical governments of the Umayyad and
Abbasid dynasties.
Regarding
the preference for the Quraish to rule over the Muslim Ummah, the Prophet ﷺsaid:
لا يَزَالُ هَذَا الأَمْرُ فِي قُرَيْشٍ، مَا بَقِيَ مِنْهُمُ
اثْنَانِ
“This
affair (of
rulership) will not vanish from the Quraish, even if there remains only two
from among them” (Bukhari)
However,
this does not mean that the government or administration of a non-Quraishi is
illegitimate. The Prophet ﷺ said:
اسْمَعُوا وَأَطِيعُوا وَإِنِ اسْتُعْمِلَ عَلَيْكُمْ عَبْدٌ
حَبَشِيٌّ كَأَنَّ رَأْسَهُ زَبِيبَةٌ
“Listen and obey even if an Ethiopian slave
whose head is like a raisin were made your chief” (Bukhari)
*Note: the
Prophet ﷺ did not mean
that the heads of Ethiopians in general resemble raisins; but that if a specific
Ethiopian individual, who in addition to being a slave his head resembles a
raisin, even then obedience is due to him if he occupied the office of temporal
authority despite the fact that society may consider such an individual unfit
for leadership.
The
narrations about temporal authority being the prerogative of the Quraish are to
be understood as not only being a matter of preference, but also prophetic and
predictive. In other words, the Prophet ﷺ stated that those who would be given
charge of the Ummah will be men of Quraish, and these are predictive statements
not necessarily instructive. And of course the prophecy materialised in the
sense that whenever the Muslim Ummah was under a single, unified authority, it
was the temporal authority of the Quraish, i.e., Khulafa al-Rashidin, Umayyads,
and Abbasids. Likewise, we know that the future government of the Mahdi
al-MuntazirAS is a restoration of the government of not only Quraish
but the Alids.
The fact
that rulership belonging to the Quraish is something ideal and preferential,
but not a condition for the legitimacy of rulership, can be derived from other
narrations, the Hadith about obedience to an Ethiopian slave having already
been cited. Another narration states:
الْمُلْكُ فِي قُرَيْشٍ وَالْقَضَاءُ فِي الأَنْصَارِ وَالأَذَانُ
فِي الْحَبَشَةِ وَالأَمَانَةُ فِي الأَزْدِ
“Rulership
is among the Quraish, judgment is among the Ansar, the Adhan is among the
Ethiopians, and the trust is among the Al-Azd.” meaning Yemen. (Tirmidhi)
Because the
Azdis are known for their trustworthiness, the Ethiopians for their strong and
beautiful voices, and the Ansaris for their justice; the Prophet ﷺ preferred that they be appointed to those
respective positions. But no one infers from this that an Amâna (trust) cannot
be rendered to a non-Azdi, or that a non-Ethiopian’s Adhân is invalid, or that
a non-Ansari cannot be a judge in a court of law. Likewise, although the
Quraish are preferred for temporal authority because of their respectable
position, this does not mean that the government of a non-Quraishi is
illegitimate.
*Note: It becomes explicitly clear that the Prophet (peace be upon him) gave the example of a specific Ethiopian individual as having a small, deformed head like a raisin, and did not intend to describe an entire genus when we examine related and similar narrations:
ReplyDeleteفَقَالَ أَبُو ذَرٍّ أَوْصَانِي خَلِيلِي صلى الله عليه وسلم أَنْ أَسْمَعَ وَأُطِيعَ وَإِنْ كَانَ عَبْدًا حَبَشِيًّا مُجَدَّعَ الأَطْرَافِ
Abu Dharr said: “My close friend (i.e., the Prophet (ﷺ)) told me to listen and obey, even if (the leader was) an Ethiopian slave with amputated limbs.” (Sunan Ibn Maja)
Hence if someone claims that the Prophet (peace be upon him) described the entire genus of Ethiopians as "raisin-heads", they would have to be consistent and likewise say that the Prophet (peace be upon him) described them as having amputated limbs as well; something self-evidently absurd.