The
first pillar of Islam is the Shahada, or testimony of faith “I bear witness
that there is none worthy of worship except Allah, and I bear witness that
Muhammad is His servant and apostle.” By simply testifying to these two things,
a person enters into Islam and becomes a Muslim. Of course, one must do so
sincerely and believe in these two testimonies in the heart, otherwise they are
faithless hypocrites or pretenders in the sight of Allah. Some Muslims have the
rigid view that the Shahadatain is only valid if read in Arabic, and that even
the slightest variation or alteration of the formula is a sort of blasphemy. The
Shi’a add a third testimony to the Shahada “I bear witness that Ali is the Wali
(saint) of Allah, the Wasi (executor of the will) of the Apostle of
Allah, and his immediate successor.” Some rigid Sunnis consider this third
testimony as a heresy that nullifies a person’s faith in Islam. However, a more
nuanced view is that the Shi’ite testimony “I bear witness that Ali is the Wali
of Allah” is believed in by Sunnis and most other Muslims too, with the
exception of the wretched but insignificant Nasiba sect (those who bear
enmity to Ali and the Ahl-al-Bayt). However, the testimony that “Ali is the
Wali of Allah” while certainly true, is nevertheless not an Article of Faith,
nor is its testimony a condition for the acceptance of Islam. The Holy Qur’an
and Sunna of the Prophet (peace be upon him) is altogether empty of such a
testimony. Therefore, if a person testifies that “Ali is the Wali of Allah”,
there is no problem with such a testimony, since it is true though not an
Article of Faith. If a person reads it intending it as part of the Shahada
through which a person enters Islam or refreshes their faith, it will be
considered an innovation, but not a heresy. As for the testimony that Ali is
the Prophet’s immediate successor [Khalīfatuhu Bilā Fasl], this is incorrect
from the standard Islamic point of view of Ahlus Sunna (Sunni Muslims), because
we hold that the Prophet’s immediate successor was Abu Bakr, while Ali was the
Prophet’s fourth successor (Allah be pleased with them both). However, in the
view of Ahlus Sunna, this is not an article of faith but rather a historical
reality. It is only the Imamiya Shi’a who consider the issue of
succession to the Prophet to be a theological matter and an article of faith. So
if someone testifies that Ali is the Prophet’s immediate successor, such a
person is obviously not a Sunni, but at the same time, they are not excluded
from Islam since such a testimony is not tantamount to any heresy or kufr.
The
Prophet (peace be upon him) himself taught a variation of the Shahada with
extra wording, illustrating that there is no fixed or definite formula, but
that if the essential Articles of Faith, particularly the Oneness of Allah and
the Prophethood of Muhammad are confessed to that is sufficient for a person to
be considered a faithful Muslim. The Prophet (peace be upon him) said:
“Whoever
bears witness that there is none worthy of worship except Allah, alone without
any partner for Him, and that Muhammad is His servant and apostle, and that Jesus
is the servant of Allah, His apostle, and His Word which He bestowed upon Mary,
and a spirit from Him, and that Janna (Paradise) is real and the Hellfire is
real, Allah shall enter him into Paradise upon whatever from his deeds.” (Sahih
al-Bukhari)
When
the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) sent his noble emissary, Dihya b. Khalifa
(Allah be pleased with him) with the letter inviting Caesar Heraclius to
embrace faith in him as God’s final prophet, Heraclius said: “Alas, by God, I
know that your master is a prophet who has been sent and that he is the one whom
we have been awaiting and whom we find in our book, but I am mortally afraid of
the Romans; but for that, I would follow him. Go to Daghatir the bishop, and
tell him of the affair of your master; for he, by God, is greater among the
Romans than I, and his word has more authority with them. See what he says to
you.” So Dihya went to Daghatir and told him what he had brought to Heraclius
from the Messenger of God and to what he was summoning him. Daghatir said: “Your
master, by God, is a prophet who has been sent. We know him by his description,
and we find him by name in our books.” Daghatir then went inside, laid off the
black robes he was wearing, put on white ones, took his staff, and came out
before the Romans while they were in the church. “People of Rome,” he said, “a
letter has come to us from Ahmad, summoning us to God.
وَإِنِّي
أَشْهَدُ أَنْ لا إِلَهَ إِلا اللَّهُ ، وَأَنَّ أَحْمَدَ عَبْدُهُ وَرَسُولُهُ
I bear witness that there is no god but Allah and that
Ahmad is His servant and His messenger.”
(The
History of al-Tabari; Volume VIII, pp. 105—106)
No comments:
Post a Comment