بسم
الله الرحمن الرحيم
وصلى
الله تعالى على خاتم النبيين
In
the Gospel according to Mark, Jesus allegedly said: “He
that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth
not shall be damned. And these signs shall follow them that believe;
In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new
tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly
thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and
they shall recover.” (Mark 16:16-18, KJV)
Now
this passage in the Gospel of Mark is disputed in its authenticity,
as it does not appear in the earliest manuscripts. The original
Gospel of Mark has an abrupt ending at verse 8 of the 16th
chapter, and there is no mention of the Great
Commission
which is in the disputed “Longer Ending”. Nevertheless, some
Christians believe in the “Longer Ending” and act upon its
teachings. For example, some Charismatic and Pentecostal churches in
Appalachia practice “snake handling”. A Pentecostal minister,
George Went Hensley (1881-1955), introduced or at least popularized
snake handling as a form of worship, based on the verse “they shall
take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not
hurt them”. Ironically, Hensley died from a deadly snakebite,
indicating he did not truly believe, or at least the weakness of his
faith, as per his own standard and understanding of the Biblical
passage. In summary, while many Christians believe in the longer
ending in Mark 16, very few, limited to some churches in Appalachia,
practice snake handling, a testament to the weakness of faith or
insincerity of most Christians today.
As
for Islam, it does not teach that not being harmed by snakebites or
from drinking poison is a necessary sign or indication of faith.
However, not being harmed by such things may indeed be a miraculous
gift from Allah ﷻ
as
a sign of an individual’s faith and trust in Him. After the
conquest of Khaybar, a Jewess or a group of Jews presented a poisoned
roast to the Prophet ﷺ
intending
to assassinate him. Although he had eaten some of it, before being
miraculously informed that it was poisoned, he survived that poisoning, although one of his companions, Bishr bin Bara’
al-Ansari
immediately died. This incident occurred after the conquest of
Khaybar, in the seventh year after the Hijrah, while the Prophet ﷺ
passed
away three years later, in the tenth year after the Hijrah. Likewise,
there is the well known incident of Khalid bin Walid
drinking poison intentionally and surviving without being harmed.
Before he drank the poison, he made the following supplication:
بسم
الله وبالله رب الأرض ورب السماء الذي لا
يضر مع اسمه داء
“In
the Name of Allah, and by Allah, Lord of Earth and Lord of Heaven, in
Whose Name no harmful, diseased (thing) can harm”
Ibn
Taymiyah has mentioned this, and stated:
من
السلف من يأتي بالآيات دلالة على صحة
الاسلام، وصدق الرسول، كما ذكر أن خالد
بن الوليد شرب السم لما طلب منه آية، ولم
يضره
From
the Salaf came certain individuals with Signs for the purpose of
proving the veracity of Islam and the truthfulness of the Apostle,
for example, Khalid bin al-Walid drinking poison when he was asked
for a sign, and it did not harm him (an-Nubuwwat; pp. 140, 825)
Recently,
in his debate with two Christians, shaykh Asrar Rashid in the UK
challenged them with the above cited passage in Mark 16. The
Christian lady, who could only speak broken English, was challenged
to “speak in new tongues” and they were both challenged to drink
from a bottle of rat poison. The Christian gentleman in the debate
was then forced to admit that the passage in Mark 16 is disputed in
its authenticity (thereby unwittingly handing the Muslim side a
victory in the debate), while the Christian lady attempted to turn
the tables by claiming that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ
said
Muslims could drink poison and eat a date afterwards (she did not
provide any source for this ridiculous allegation). Nevertheless, for
the purpose of demonstrating his faith and the truth of Islam and the
Prophet Muhammad ﷺ,
shaykh Asrar Rashid unhesitatingly drank a good amount from the
bottle of rat poison. He not only survived, but did not feel any pain
or sickness:
Those
who doubt whether it was real poison should remember that the shaykh
did not intend to drink it himself, but offer it as a challenge to
the Christians based on the passage in Mark 16. It was only because
the Christian lady attempted to turn the tables on him and challenged
him to drink the poison did he do so, otherwise he clearly did not
intend to drink from it.
However,
certain elements within the Muslim community have criticized and even
ridiculed shaykh Asrar Rashid for having drunk poison. They are
apparently unaware of the example of Khalid bin al-Walid .
In conclusion, Muslims who are confident in their faith may, for the
purpose of demonstrating the truth of Islam, drink poison and they
shall not be harmed by the power of Allah.
No comments:
Post a Comment