بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
والصلاة والسلام على اشرف الانبياء والمرسلين
والعاقبة للمتقين
Allah says:
وَلِكُلِّ أُمَّةٍ رَّسُولٌ ۖ فَإِذَا
جَاءَ رَسُولُهُمْ قُضِيَ بَيْنَهُم بِالْقِسْطِ وَهُمْ لَا يُظْلَمُونَ
And for
every nation is a messenger. So when their messenger comes, it will be judged
between them in justice, and they will not be wronged
(Sura
10:47)
وَلَقَدْ بَعَثْنَا فِي كُلِّ أُمَّةٍ
رَّسُولًا أَنِ اعْبُدُوا اللَّـهَ وَاجْتَنِبُوا الطَّاغُوتَ
And We
certainly sent into every nation a messenger, [saying], ‘Worship Allah and
avoid the Taghut.’
(Sura
16:36)
وَإِن مِّنْ أُمَّةٍ إِلَّا خَلَا فِيهَا
نَذِيرٌ
And
there was no nation but that there had passed within it a warner
(Sura
35:24)
These verses establish the fact
that every nation from among humanity had at least one apostle of Allah sent to
them in the past. However, some omnist interpretations of Islam have taken this
as a license to take for granted that every famous world religious figure was a
prophet. The Qur’an acknowledges that it only mentions some of the many
messengers who were sent by Allah (Sura 40:78). Therefore it cannot be said
with certainty that any famous world religious figure of the past whose name is
not mentioned in the Qur’an or whose prophesy was not confirmed by Prophet Muhammad
(sall Allahu alayhi wasallam) was a prophet. Those who insist that well known
religious figures such as Krisna, Buddha, Confucius, Zoroaster, etc. should be
acknowledged as prophets in Islam use the verses in the Quran which speak of
messengers having been sent to every nation as their justification. But the
logic doesn’t follow. Just because there was a famous religious figure who may
have founded a world religion or otherwise had a great impact on history doesn’t
necessarily mean he was a true prophet and apostle of God. It is better to remain silent and neither affirm or
deny whether a figure like Zoroaster, for example, was actually a prophet.
Allah knows best and we are not responsible for determining the identity of
every prophet and messenger that was sent in the past but who isn’t explicitly
mentioned by name in our sacred texts. It is sufficient to say we believe in
all the prophets and apostles of Allah including those whose names and
identities we are not aware of.
Nevertheless, there are certain historical figures
regarding whom it can be said for certain that they were not prophets. Certain
Greek philosophers, great kings and emperors, poets, mystics, etc., had a great
impact on history and contributed to the development of human thought.
Nevertheless, they were not prophets of God. In many instances, they were
polytheists, misguided and/or had flaws in their character. The scholar of the
Ahl ul-Hadith sect in the Indian subcontinent, Wahid uz-Zaman, wrote that
Socrates was among the prophets. Likewise, the fourth caliph of the Ahmadiyya
sect, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, stated in his magnum opus concerning Socrates: “Readily,
he gave up his life with such peace of mind and tranquility of soul, on the altar
of his conviction in the Unity of God, as behoves any great prophet of God...It
is this great Greek philosopher of a prophet, who is paradoxically
described as ‘the father of Western Philosophy’.” (Revelation, Rationality,
Knowledge and Truth, p.79)
“Yet among them, there was born in 470 BC a monotheist
philosopher whose name was Socrates. He was a prophet among philosophers and a
philosopher among prophets.” (ibid, pp.174-175)
Ironically, the founder of the Ahmadiyya movement, Mirza
Ghulam Ahmad, himself rejected the notion that Socrates and the other well
known Greek philosophers (Aristotle, Plato, etc.) were prophets of God (Chashmah-i-Maarifat
p.401):
The Greek philosophers were not ‘monotheists’ according
to the Islamic conception of monotheism. Platonic and Aristotelian philosophy
is fundamentally at odds with orthodox Islamic theology based on the teachings,
revelations and visions of the true Prophets, including the Seal of Prophets
Muhammad (peace be upon him & his family).
While Allah Most High sent a messenger and warner for
every nation in the past, it was particularly the Children of Israel whom He
blessed with the institution of prophesy such that a large number of prophets
were raised up among them, one after the other, at times multiple prophets being
raised up among them simultaneously. And the vast majority of prophets related
in the holy Qur’an were the Israelite prophets (Moses, Aaron, Job, Jonas,
Samuel, David, Solomon, Elias, Elisha, Zechariah, John, Jesus). As for the
warners and apostles of God that were sent to other nations, perhaps their identities
and accounts have been lost to history, as they were rejected by their nations
which persisted in idolatry and polytheism. It is no use claiming that Krisna,
Buddha, Confucius, Zoroaster, Socrates, etc., were prophets. Among these,
perhaps Zoroaster is most worthy of being considered an actual prophet, but even
that is mere speculation and not based on any definite proof. The heresy of
omnism has popularized the idea that these and other well known major world
religious figures must have been prophets. It is motivated by a desire to validate
and unite all the religions of the world. So-called Islamic evangelists like
Dr. Zakir Naik quote from Hindu scriptures in an attempt to demonstrate that
the advent of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is predicted in Hinduism. Such
proofs and efforts are dubious at best, since the Hindu scriptures are
extremely suspect, full of polytheism and misguidance. This approach of the
omnists, modernists and so-called experts of comparative religion is only for
point scoring and is not academic or sincerely thought out.
"It is no use claiming that Krisna, Buddha, Confucius, Zoroaster, Socrates, etc., were prophets. "
ReplyDeleteYou realize hadrat Ahmad(as) claimed Krishna was a prophet?