After a long interval, I am now continuing the critique
of Iqbal’s book Islam and Ahmadism. Iqbal writes: “A careful
psychological analysis of the revelations of the founder would perhaps be an
effective method of dissecting the inner life of his personality.” (p. 26).
Iqbal goes on to express his wish that in the future a student of modern
psychology should analyze the revelations claimed by Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian.
The purpose would be to expose the claim of Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian as being
based on ego and not a genuine inspiration from God. However, Iqbal failed to
realize that similar assaults on the integrity of Islam have been done by
analyzing the text of the Holy Quraan in light of modern psychology under the
assumption that the Holy Quraan was authored by Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon
him) and is not a genuine divine inspiration. Iqbal’s error is in relating a
modern discipline such as psychology to analyze the reality of someone claiming
to be a recipient of divine revelation. From an Islamic perspective, such an
analysis has no value since it is based on a false assumption. Therefore, to
apply this kind of analysis to Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian while rejecting such an
analysis of the revelations to Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is
inconsistent and biased.
Next, Iqbal launches a tirade against ‘Ahmadism’ by
asserting that its function was to serve the British colonialist interest of
furnishing a ‘revelational’ basis for “India’s present political subjugation.”
(p. 31). Iqbal explains this further by elucidating the idea that ‘Ahmadism’
seeks to make Muslims accept their ‘political subjugation’, i.e., normalize
that subjugation from a theological perspective resting on the authority of
divine revelation. Iqbal writes: “One can only imagine the rotten state of a
people’s will who are, on the basis of Divine authority, made to accept their
political environment as final.” (p. 33).
Iqbal’s charge is false as proven by history, since the
Ahmadiyya enthusiastically participated in the Pakistan movement. Nevertheless,
his words reveal the fact that he failed to understand Ghulam Ahmad’s theology
concerning the political subjugation of the Muslims and the British colonial
government. The truth is, Ghulam Ahmad’s theology reflected the statement
attributed to Jesus of Nazareth in the Gospel of John: “My Kingdom is not of
this world.” (John 18: 36). In other words, whether any Muslim agrees with it
or not, the fact is that Ghulam Ahmad’s theology was not to ‘glorify’ the
political subjugation of India’s Muslims, but only to put forward the notion
that the Mohammedan Messiah’s role was not to establish his political or
temporal authority, but rather to bring about a spiritual awakening and
religious revival.
Makam muslim I am impressed. I don't think Ive met anyone who knows as much about this subject as you do. You are truly well informed and very intelligent. You wrote something that people could understand and made the subject intriguing for everyone. Really, great blog you have got here.
ReplyDeleteJazakum Allah Khaira
Delete