Ikhwan al Muslimeen Exposed: "We are Working to Make Unity Between Cross and Crescent"

Muhammad al-Ghazzali, one of the leading ideologues and senior members of the infamous Ikhwan al Muslimeen (Muslim Brotherhood), an extremely misguided and dangerous sect, said proudly that he and his sect are working to create unity between the Cross (Christianity) and the Crescent (meaning Islam):

إِنَّنَا نَسْتَرِيحُ مِنْ صَمِيمِ قُلُوبِنَا إِلَى قِيَامِ اِتِّحَادٍ بين الصَّلِيبِ وَالهِلَالِ

Translation: “We are at ease in our hearts in working to make unity between the cross and the crescent.”

Reference: Min Hunaa Na'alam; p.124

Hanafi Fiqh: Bestiality Does not Invalidate Hajj معاذ الله

Dear readers! In this entry I shall show you what kind of Hajj is offered by the Hanafis (blind-followers of Abu Hanifa and Co.)

According to Fatawa Alamgiri, if a person has sex with an animal (bestiality), either resulting in ejaculation or not, his Hajj is not rendered void. In other words, if a person does such a disgusting act during Hajj, according to the Hanafis, his Hajj is in order!

وَلَوْ أَتَى بَهِيمَةً فَأَوْلَجَهَا فَلَا شَيْءَ عَلَيْهِ إِلَّا إِذَا أَنْزَلَ فَيَجِبُ عَلَيْهِ الدَّمُ وَلَا تُفْسِدُ حُجَّتُهُ وَلَا عُمْرَتُهُ

اگر وہ جانور کے پاس آۓ اور اس میں داخل کرے تو اس پر کوئی تاوان نہیں ہاں اگر انزال ہو جاۓ تو اس پر قربانی واجب ہوگی اور اس کا حج فاسد نہیں ہوگا۔

Translation: “If someone comes to an animal and copulates with it, there is nothing upon him (to compensate for), except if ejaculation occurs, then it is mandatory for him to offer a blood sacrifice, but neither his Hajj nor his Umrah are nullified.”

On the same page, another mas'alah regarding Hajj is mentioned, that if a person looks with lust at a woman and ejaculation occurs, similarly, there is nothing upon him to compensate for and neither is his Hajj nullified:

وان نَظَرَ إلَى فَرْجِ اِمْرَأَةٍ بشَهْوَةٍ فَأَمْنَى لَا شَيْءَ عَلَيْهِ

اگر وہ عورت کی شرمگاہ کی طرف شہوت کے ساتھ دیکھے اور بہہ جاۓ تو اس پر کوئی تاوان نہیں۔

Translation: “If a person (during Hajj or Umrah) looks at a woman's private part with lust, causing ejaculation, then there is nothing upon him to compensate.”

Reference: Fatawa Alamgiri; vol.1, p.244

Deobandism Exposed: Naked Majzoobah in Deoband! استغفر الله

The Deobandi sect considers as “Awliya” (saints) all kinds of perverse, mad, and filthy people. Muhammad Roohullah Naqshbandi has compiled an entire book detailing the stories of the Majazeeb (people who are insane or out of their senses) who are venerated and respected by the Deobandis. The Deobandis read their anecdotes for inspiration and consider the Majazeeb as eminent people close to Allah.

So the following is a story of a naked Majzoobah (female Majzoob) in Deoband itself:

دیوبند کی ایک مجذوبہ

دیوبند میں ایک بزرگ تھے مولانا فرید الدین صاحب اور ان کے زمانے میں ایک مجذوبہ تھی، وہ ننگی پھرا کرتی تھی، کسی نے پوچھا کہ تو ستر کیوں نہیں چھپاتی کہنے لگی بیلوں اور گدھوں سے پردہ کا حکم نہیں ہے پردہ آدمیوں سے  ہوتا ہے۔ ایک روز حسب معمول برہنہ پھر رہی تھی ایک دم کہنے لگی کپڑا لاؤ کپڑا لاؤ مرد آرہا ہے تھوڑی دیر میں مولانا فرید الدین صاحب تشریف لاۓ۔

Translation: In Deoband there was an elder named Maulana Fariduddin and in his time there was a Majzoobah. She used to go around naked. Someone asked her, 'why don't you conceal your satr (private parts)?' She said: 'It is not necessary to veil oneself before bulls and donkeys...it is only commanded to veil oneself in the presence of men.' One day she was going about ordinarily when all of a sudden she began to exclaim: 'Bring clothing! Bring clothing! A man is approaching'. After a little while Maulana Fariduddin appeared.

Reference: Majazeeb Ki Pur Asrar Dunya; p.84

Shi'a Fatwa: Janaza (Funeral) Prayer Can be Offered Without Wudu

In the following Shi'a narration from the book Al-Kafi, the most authentic book of Twelver Shi'ite Hadith, it is mentioned that Wudu (purification) is not necessary for offering the Salat ul Janazah (funeral prayers):

محمد بن يحيى، عن أحمد بن محمد بن عيسى، عن ابن فضال، عن يونس بن يعقوب 

قال: سألت أبا عبدالله (عليه السلام) عن الجنازة أيصلى عليها على غير وضوء؟ 

فقال: نعم إنما هو (1) تكبير وتحميد وتسبيح وتهليل كما تكبر وتسبح في بيتك 

على غير وضوء  

Translation: Yunus b. Ya'qub said: I asked Imam Aba Abdillah Ja'far (AS) about the Janazah, is it possible to pray it without Wudu? So he said: “Yes, it is Takbir, Tahmid, Tasbih, and Tahlil, like you do Takbir and Tasbih in your house without Wudu.”

Reference: Furu al-Kafi; vol.1, p.176

Shi'a Fatwa: It is Forbidden to Say "Ameen" After Recitation of Fatiha

According to the Twelver Shi'ah, it is forbidden to supplicate to Allah by saying “Ameen” after the recitation of the Fatiha during Salat:

[ 7362 ] 1 ـ محمّد بن يعقوب ، عن علي بن إبراهيم ، عن أبيه ، عن عبد الله بن المغيرة ، عن جميل ، عن أبي عبد الله ( عليه السلام ) قال : إذا كنت خلف إمام فقرأ الحمد وفرغ من قراءتها فقل أنت : الحمد لله ربّ العالمين ، ولا تقل : آمين. 

 محمّد بن الحسن باسناده عن محمد بن يعقوب ، مثله. 

1 – Muhammad b. Ya`qub from `Ali b. Ibrahim from his father from `Abdullah b. Mughira from Jamil b. Durraj from Abu `Abdillah (AS).  He said: When you are behind an imam and he has recited al-Hamd, and finished its recitation, then you say "al-Hamdu lillaahi rabbi 'l-`aalameen", and do not say "ameen."

Muhammad b. al-Hasan by his isnad from Muhammad b. Ya`qub likewise.

 [ 7363 ] 2 ـ وبإسناده عن الحسين بن سعيد ، عن حمّاد بن عيسى ، عن معاوية بن وهب قال : قلت لأبي عبد الله ( عليه السلام ) : أقول : آمين إذا قال الإمام : غير المغضوب عليهم ولا الضالين ، قال : هم اليهود والنصارى ، ولم يجب في هذا. 

2 – And by his isnad from al-Husayn b. Sa`id from Hammad b. `Isa from Mu`awiya b. Wahb.  He said: I said to Abu `Abdillah (AS): I say “ameen” when the imam said “ghayri ‘l-maghDoobi `alayhim wa la ‘D-Daalleen”.  He said: They are the Jews and the Christians.  And he did not respond regarding this.

 [ 7346 ] 3 ـ وعنه ، عن محمّد بن سنان ، عن ابن مسكان ، عن محمّد الحلبي قال : سألت أبا عبد الله ( عليه السلام ) أقول إذا فرغت من فاتحة الكتاب : آمين ؟ قال : لا. 

3 – And from him from Muhammad b. Sinan from Ibn Muskan from Muhammad al-Halabi.  He said: I asked Abu `Abdillah (AS): Do I say “ameen” when I have finished from the Fatiha of the Book?  He said: No.

[ 7365 ] 4 ـ وقد تقدّم في كيفية الصلاة حديث زرارة ، عن أبي جعفر ( عليه السلام ) قال : ولا تقولنّ إذا فرغت من قراءتك : آمين ، فان شئت قلت : الحمد لله ربّ العالمين. 

4 – And the hadith of Zurara has preceded in (the section of) the method of salat from Abu Ja`far (AS), (that) he said: And when you have finished from your qira’at do not say “ameen”.  So if you want, you say “al-Hamdu lillaahi rabbi ‘l-`aalameen”.

 [ 7366 ] 5 ـ وعنه ، عن ابن أبي عمير ، عن جميل قال : سألت أبا عبد الله ( عليه السلام ) عن قول الناس في الصلاة جماعة حين يقرأ فاتحة الكتاب : آمين ؟ قال : ما أحسنها واخفض الصوت بها. 

5 – And from him from Ibn Abi `Umayr from Jamil.  He said: I asked Abu `Abdillah (AS) about the saying of the people in the congregational salat when the Fatiha of the Book is recited: ameen.  He said: How very good it is.  And lower the voice with it.

[ 7367 ] 6 ـ الفضل بن الحسن الطبرسي في ( مجمع البيان ) : عن فضيل بن يسار ، عن أبي عبد الله ( عليه السلام ) قال : إذا قرأت الفاتحة ففرغت من قراءتها فقل : الحمد لله ربّ العالمين. 

6 – al-Fadl b. al-Hasan at-Tabrisi in Majma` al-Bayan from Fudayl b. Yasar from Abu `Abdillah (AS).  He said: When you have recited al-Fatiha and finished from its qira’at, then say “al-Hamdu lillaahi rabbi ‘l-`aalameen”.

Reference: Wasa'il ash-Shi'ah; vol.6, p.67-68

 

Shi'a Fatwa: It is Allowed for an Adult Muslim Woman to Pray Bareheaded استغفر الله

The following are narrations from the book Wasa'il ash-Shi'ah (highly regarded by the Twelver Shi'ite sect) in which are narrations that permit a free adult Muslim woman to offer Salat bareheaded!

وعنه ، عن أحمد بن محمّد ، عن محمّد بن عبدالله الأنصاري ، عن صفوان بن

 

يحيى ، عن عبدالله بن بكير ، عن أبي عبدالله ( عليه السلام ) قال : لا

 

بأس بالمرأة المسلمة الحرّة أن تصلّي وهي مكشوفة الرأس

 

 

 

Translation: “And from him from Ahmad b. Muhammad from Muhammad b. `Abdullah al-Ansari from Safwan b. Yahya from `Abdullah b. Bukayr from Abu `Abdillah (AS). He said: There is no harm with the free Muslim woman praying while her head is uncovered."

وعنه ، عن أبي علي بن محمّد بن عبدالله بن أبي أيوب ، عن علي بن أسباط ، عن

 

عبدالله بن بكير ، عن أبي عبدالله ( عليه السلام ) قال : لا بأس أن تصلّي

 

المرأة المسلمة وليس على رأسها قناع .

Translation: “And from him from Abu `Ali b. Muhammad b. `Abdullah b. Abi Ayyub from `Ali b. Asbat from `Abdullah b. Bukayr from Abu `Abdillah (AS). He said: There is no harm with the Muslim woman praying while she does not have a veil (qina) upon her head."

 

Reference: Wasa'il ash-Shi'ah; vol.4, p.410

 

 

Shah Ismail of Delhi: The Prophet (AS) has mingled with dust

Shah Isma'il of Delhi (1779-1831) the lieutenant of Syed Ahmad of Rai Barailly, claimed that the Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa ala Aalihi wasallam) has mingled with dust:

یعنی میں بھی ایک دن مر کر مٹی میں ملنے والا ہوں

Translation: “One day I (Prophet) too shall die and be mingled with dust.”

Reference: Taqwiyat ul Iman; p.132

Hanafi Fiqh: Allowed to Reopen Grave in Order to Recover A Single Dirham!

Read the following and realize how the Hanafi madhhab gives preference to recovery of wealth, even a single Dirham, over following the Sunnah. According to the Hanafis, it is forbidden to open the grave of a dead person who was buried incorrectly (not facing the Qiblah). In other words, the Hanafis forbid opening the grave of a dead person who was not buried according to the Sunnah, in order to rectify his/her burial. However, the Hanafis say it is allowed to re-open the grave of someone in order to recover any wealth or item, even a single Dirham!

لَوْ وُضِعَ الميت لِغَيْرِ الْقِبْلَةِ ...وَأُهِيلَ عَلَيْهِ التُّرَابُ لَمْ يُنْبَشْ ...وَإِن وقع فى القبر متاع فعلم بذلك بَعْدَ مَا أَهَالُوا عَلَيْهِ التُّرَابُ يُنْبَشْ...وَلَوْ كَانَ المَال درهما

اگر میت کو قبلہ رخ نہ رکھا جاۓ اور اس پر مٹی ڈال دی جاۓ تو دوبارہ قبر نہ کھودی جاۓ اور اگر قبر میں کو‌ئی شے گر پڑے اور مٹی ڈالنے کے بعد پتہ چلے تو قبر کو کھودا جاۓ۔ چاہے وہ ایک درہم ہی کیوں نہ ہو۔

Translation: “If the mayyit (dead) was not placed in the grave facing the Qiblah, and he/she was buried in that condition, then to re-open the grave is not allowed. And if something fell into the grave and it became known after burial, then it is allowed to open the grave in order to recover it, even if it was a single Dirham.”

Reference: Fatawa Alamgiri; vol.1, p.167

 

Hasan al-Banna Claims the Dispute between Muslims and Jews is not Related to Deen

Hasan al-Banna, the devious founder of the dangerous and misguided sect Ikhwan al Muslimeen (so called “Muslim Brotherhood”), a political organization masquerading as an Islamic reform movement, wrote that in his opinion the dispute between the Muslims and Jews is not at all religious in nature:

فَأُقَرِّرُ إِنَّ خُصُومَتِنَا لِليَهُودِ لَيْسَتْ دِينِيَّةً لِأَنَّ القُرْآنَ الكَرِيمَ حُضَّ عَلَى

 

مصافاتهم وَمُصَادَقَتِهِمْ

Translation: “And I affirm here that our dispute with the Jews is not one concerning the religion because the Qur'an al-Karim has encouraged us to befriend them and be cordial with them.”

Reference: Ikhwan ul Muslimoon, Ahdaath Sana'at Tarikh; vol.1, p.409

 

Syed Qutb: Islam is not Uneasy About the Differences of Aqidah and Manhaj in Mankind

To get a feel for just how extremely lost in darkness Syed Qutb was, one must only read the following passage from his book:

ولم يضق ذرعاً باختلاف الناس في المنهج والعقيدة ، بل اعتبر هذا ضرورة من

 

 ضرورات الفطرة ، وغرضاً من أغراض الإرادة العليا في الحياة والناس 

 

Translation: “Islam does not feel uneasy about the differences of mankind in aqeedah (creed) and manhaj (methodology), rather it considers this as something necessitated by natural disposition and a goal from a higher will in life amongst the people."

Reference: Nahwa Mujtami' Islami, p.103

 

Barelwi Shirk: Light of the Prophet (AS) is the Light of Allah's Essence

It is well known that the Barelwis are a sect of polytheistic 'grave-worshipers' whose beliefs regarding the Prophet Muhammad (alayhis salam) are similar to the beliefs of the Christians regarding Jesus Christ.

For example, the Barelwis quote and have faith in the fabricated tradition:

يَا جَابِرُ ، إِنَّ اللَّهَ خَلَقَ قَبْلَ الأَشْيَاءِ نُورُ نَبِيِّكَ مِنْ نُورِهِ

 

Translation: “O Jabir! Verily Allah created before all things the Light of your Prophet from His own Light.”

Of course, this Hadith is absolutely fabricated. But the fact that the Barelwis believe this lie indicates their preference for Shirk. Because according to this narration, the Prophet's Light was created from the Light of Allah's Essence معاذ الله

And this is admitted by Sultan Bahu, considered a Wali/Saint by the deviated Barelwi mushrikeen, who wrote:

نور محمد^ص نور ذات احدی ہے

Translation: The light of Muhammad (S) is the Light of the Essence of the One God

Reference: Taufeeq ul Hadayat, p.8

Hanafi Fiqh: Crows, Bats, Owls and Mules are Halal (Permissible to Eat)

According to the verdict of Abu Hanifah, it is allowed to eat crows, even those crows which eat filth!

عَنْ أَبِي يُوسُفُ قَالَ: سَأَلْتُ أَبَا حَنِيفَةَ عَنْ العَقْعَقِ فَقَالَ: لَا بَأْسَ فَقُلْتُ: إِنَّهُ يَأْكُلُ النجاسات فَقَالَ: إِنَّهُ يَخْلِطُ النجاسة بشئ آخَرَ ثُمَّ يَأْكُلُ فَكَانَ الْأَصْلُ عِنْدَهُ أَنَّ مَا يَخْلِطُ كَالدَّجَاجِ لَا بَأْسَ

ابو یوسف کہتے ہیں میں نے ابو حنیفہ سے کوے کے بارے میں پوچھا تو فرمایا کوئی حرج نہیں۔ میں نے عرض کیا یہ نجاست کھاتا ہے تو کہا وہ نجاست کو دوسرے شے سے ملا کر کھاتا ہے۔ ان کا مطلب یہ تھا کہ جو مرغی کی طرح مخلوط غزا کھاۓ وہ حلال ہے۔

Translation: Abu Yusuf said he asked Abu Hanifah regarding the 'Aq'aq (a kind of crow). Abu Hanifah said: “There is no problem with it.” I said: “But it eats filth”. Abu Hanifah said: “It eats filth mixed with other things.” According to Abu Hanifah that which, like the chicken, eats filth mixed with other things is permissible (to eat).

Furthermore it is mentioned:

فَإِنْ كَانَ الْغُرَابُ بِحَيْثُ يَخْلِطُ فَيَأْكُلُ الْجِيَفَ تَارَةً وَالْحَبَّ تَارَةً فَقَدْ رُوِيَ عَنْ أَبِي يُوسُفَ أَنَّهُ يُكْرَهُ وَعَنْ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ أَنَّهُ لَا بَأْسَ بِأَكْلِهِ ، وَهُوَ الصَّحِيحُ عَلَى قِيَاسِ الدَّجَاجَةِ

Translation: As for the Ghurab (crow) which mixes filth with other food, then according to Abu Yusuf it is disliked (to eat it), but according to Abu Hanifah there is no problem in eating it, and this is the correct opinion based on analogy with the chicken.

Next, on the same page, it is mentioned that it is permissible to eat bats!

وَأَمَّا الخُفَّاشُ فَقَدْ ذِكْرٌ فِي بَعْضِ المَوَاضِعِ أَنَّهُ يُؤْكَلُ

بعض جگہ مذکور ہے کہ چمگادڑ حلال ہے۔

Translation: It is mentioned in some places that bats are permissible (to eat).

It is also mentioned that the owl is Halal for eating according to the Hanafi jurisprudence:

وَالْبُومُ يُؤْكَلُ

الو حلال ہے۔

Translation: The owl is permissible for eating.

Next, the Hanafis consider the mule to be Halal for eating!

اما البغل فعند ابى حنيفه لحمه مكروه على كل حال وعندهما كذلك ان كان الفرس نزا على الاتان وان كان الحمار نزا على الرمكة فقد قيل لا يكره

ابو حنیفہ کے نزدیک ہر قسم کے خچر کا گوشت مکروہ ہے صاحبین کے نزدیک خچرا اگر گھوڑے اور گدھی کی اولاد ہو تو مکروہ ہے۔ لیکن اگر گدھے اور گھوڑی کی اولاد ہو تو مکروہ نہیں۔

Translation: According to Abu Hanifah, the meat of the mule is disliked to eat in all circumstances. But according to the both of us (Sahibain – Abu Yusuf and Muhammad) the meat of the mule is disliked if it is the offspring of a male horse and female donkey. If the mule is an offspring of a male donkey and a female horse, then its meat is not disliked for eating (it is permissible to eat).

Reference: Fatawa Alamgiri; vol.5, p.290